Brendan Conoboy wrote:

Questions from the meeting:

How are ARM-specific issues such as legacy alignment problems to be addressed?

Are alignment problems not considered bugs? It's not just that this will break code on ARM < v7 and IIRC SPARC, but alignment issues also cause cache line straddling which has a performance impact.

If Anaconda isn't used to do installations, what will be doing the things Anaconda does which just installing a bunch of packages doesn't? (I don't know what these are)

Is there any actual reason why Anaconda cannot be used? What is to stop booting a suitable installation kernel for the target platform and having that fetch/mount an installation rootfs that takes over, same as it does in x86? Granted the amount of RAM is an issue, but that's just a case of dieting the installer back to a saner size (de-lobotomizing the text mode installer back to how it was before F11, for example).

All PA kernels must be derived from the same source rpm.

I found that if the kernel has support for the right SoC, it is simply a case of adding a suitable SoC merge config file and plumbing it in for the build based on a build flag. I have somewhere a 2.6.32-220.<something> kernel src.rpm that builds for both x86 and Marvell Kirkwood, and it was reasonably straightforward to achieve (even if it did require fixing a few bugs that were introduced by upstream vendor patches that didn't manifest on the primary arch).

Gordan
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Reply via email to