On 05/10/2013 02:10 PM, John Brier wrote: > Hi, it seems that somehow CONFIG_LATENCYTOP and > CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT are not even in the /boot/config-* > generated files > > [root@calxeda-arm-soc-02 SOURCES]# grep -i latency /boot/config-3. > config-3.6.10-8.fc18.armv7l.highbank config-3.8.11-200.fc18.armv7l > [root@calxeda-arm-soc-02 SOURCES]# grep -i latency /boot/config-3.* > [root@calxeda-arm-soc-02 SOURCES]# > > Is this intentional or can I open a bug on it? I tried to follow the > process that a config file is generated from during rpmbuild but it was > not clear to me.. a pointer on how that happens would also be nice.
Currently, 32-bit ARM LATENCYTOP support is dependent upon !SMP. Separately, I have been screening through all of the discrepancies between x86_64 and AArch64 and have already identified this as a feature enhancement needed for 64-bit. I have that, and a laundry list of related features that I will be raising with ARM/Linaro elsewhere. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
