>Why disable SELinux?

It does not provide any significant value for my Raspberry Pi computer
intended for use as an embedded system or in a DACS role, where network
security is important but a simple (root or user) local privilege scheme
is fine.  The goals of SELinux are important, but its rocky history
suggests there will continue to be problems.  I am reluctant to spend
resources on SELinux for these Raspberry Pi systems, but will do so for
open or multi-user systems.

Actually, the fedora-arm-image-installer "--selinux=off" option
configures SELinux to permissive mode, therefore it will still report
troubles but not interrupt programs because of them.  This seems a good
middle ground.

>When in the boot process? Was it the grub2 menu

Possibly.  I do not know.  If you think it useful, I will repeat the
experiment and make a video recording of the console.  I do not see
evidence of the pause in the log files:

http://ryniker.org/Fedora/dmesg03
http://ryniker.org/Fedora/log03

>So why not just use the minimal image?

I probobly ought to, but in this case I wanted to try an aarch64 image
similar to one that Tomáš Frolík reported caused him difficulty.

>I've had reports of this [on board wired Ethernet port] working fine

From the log file, it appears to fail (repeatedly) during appempts to
perform a DHCP operation for its default configuration.  However, default
configuration of the USB Ethernet dongle uses DHCP without any problem.
This suggests a hardware setup or driver issue is the culprit.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to