On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Patrick Wildt wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:18:19 +0200
From: Patrick Wildt <[email protected]>
To: Diana Eichert <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: any support for Boundary Nitrogen6x?
Hello Diana,
I didn't get much resonance for that board, so I didn't pursue
getting that arch into the tree. First, I'd like to have a generic
ARM arch, so that you don't have to have an arch for every
SoC out there.
Isn't that what device trees are for? For embedded SoC's, the approach of
describing the SoC registers, peripherals, clocks, memory and various in a
device independant manner would be the way to proceed, no??
Cheers,
Rob.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=
Robert S. Sciuk http://www.controlq.com 259 Simcoe St. S.
Control-Q Research tel: 905.706.1354 Oshawa, Ont.
[email protected] Canada, L1H 4H3
