fabio wrote: >1) The current distribution of wealth fits the latitude hypothesis >pretty well. ... >2) The real question is whether the current distribution of wealth is >typical or not. If you did the same study 1000 AD, would you get the same >picture? This is indeed the right question to ask. There seem to be just too many possible explanatory variables and too few independent data points at the moment. The solution: get more data points! Robin Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hanson.gmu.edu Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444 703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
- Re[2]: Growth, Wealth, and Race Alexandre
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race John Cunningham
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Maria Pia Paganelli
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david mitchinson
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Robin Hanson
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Richard . Eichmann
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Girard
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Ole J. Rogeberg
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman