Possibly.  In many species of birds, the female will mate with high 
quality males who are often not around b/c high quality males have many 
mating opportunities.  The female then nests with a lower quality male 
who raises the young.  I don't actually know if humans do this, b/c 
humans don't always fit the models.

Mitch Mitchell

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2001 7:17 am
Subject: Re: Disaster Raises Happiness, Trust

> I think this is a good EP explanation  for men, but there is a 
> problem with it as an explanation for women. I have to admit that 
> I don't know if women are aroused by stress as well, but from the 
> woman's perspective it would seem that her offspring would be most 
> likely to succeed if she waited for the guys to come back and then 
> picked from that bunch. They would presumably be a more fit sub-
> sample of the original population and would be more likely to be 
> around to help provide for the children. - - Bill Dickens
> 
> 
> William T. Dickens
> The Brookings Institution
> 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
> Washington, DC 20036
> Phone: (202) 797-6113
> FAX:     (202) 797-6181
> E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AOL IM: wtdickens
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/01 10:19PM >>>
>    With regard to Mr. Dickens' comment regarding whether stress 
> should cause 
> sexual arousal, I am tempted to think that evolutionary psychology 
> can 
> certainly explain this phenomenon.  Early societies, according to 
> most models 
> of human development, used the males as hunters and warriors; 
> females were 
> gatherers.  With this division of labor, males certainly incurred 
> the more 
> perilous part of the community's job.  Before an important hunt or 
> major 
> battle, it is manifestly in the male's evolutionary favor to 
> become sexually 
> aroused; after all, this may be his genome's last chance to 
> reproduce itself! 
> Even if he dies in battle, his sex partners -- still safely at 
> home -- will 
> be able to bear his young. 
> 
> 

Reply via email to