Kevin Carson wrote: >>I haven't read the Pipes book. He's a neoconservative, isn't he?
I don't know what the term "neoconservative" means, nor do I understand why that particular label is relevant to this discussion. >I've read Bethell's book in parts, and skimmed through most of it. It >strikes me as a very ahistoric view of property: taking the contemporary, >Lockean/capitalist model of private property as some kind of Platonic ideal, >and then judging history as it progressively approximated that ideal over >time. If you had actually read the book carefully, you would realize that your assessment couldn't be more incorrect. Alex
