Jacob W Braestrup wrote: > . . . And while we are at it: > why not also control for happines? What is all this focus on money? - > why strive for equality only on that parameter and not the > more "important" ones??
Reminds me of a story in one of the sf magazines - an abnormally cheerful man was found to have an abnormally high level of endorphins, and was compelled to take treatment to compensate, because we can't have people running loose on what amounts to a permanent drug trip. I wonder how many read the story and thought it a good idea. (And where's my cut of that guy's excess?) -- Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
