Are you using the default chrome os kernel or is it a native one? On Mar 31, 2013 10:09 PM, "Stuart Winter" <m-li...@biscuit.org.uk> wrote:
> > > Incidentally Eric mentions the Chromebook as one of the reasons to port > the > > hf. I did install a full rootfs of Armedslack (sf) on the Chromebook and > it > > did work. I then gave up because of lack of feedback and because my unit > > was faulty. > > Yep I'm writing this using WindowMaker with Slackware ARM on the > Chomebook. I just used the miniroot and some Chromebook tweaks. > I'm planning on making Slackware ARM installable on the Chromebook - I've > already started laying the groundwork. > > Slackware ARM will run on any 32-bit machine that's armv4 + thumb or > greater. Slackware needs a hard float port as we're the only distro > without one, and given that ARM is becoming more prevalent it's (IMO) > important that Slackware is able to deliver max performance on the > machines with a hardware floating point unit -- allowing them to be able > to render multi media efficiently. > > That said, for general usage (non multi media) I really don't think > there's much in it with soft vs hard float. Running Firefox and some > other stuff on this Chromebook is *fast* even with the default Slackware > ARM packages. > > -- > Stuart Winter > Slackware ARM: http://arm.slackware.com > _______________________________________________ > ARMedslack mailing list > ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org > http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack >
_______________________________________________ ARMedslack mailing list ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack