I haven't been very active with Slackware ARM lately for lack of time, but I vote for migrating the list to a sub-forum on LinuxQuestions.org. I receive tons of e-mail per day and end up not reading everything. The idea of having both Slackware-x86 and Slackware-ARM discussions on the same site sound good to me.
-- Niels Horn On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Stuart Winter <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > I can't agree with your personal opinion on forums, Stuart, sorry. :P > > I'm still not a fan of forums but the great thing about them in this > instance is that the rest of the Slackware discussions are going on, so > I'd rather link the ARM port to the rest of it rather than having it as > an outlier. > > > However, I do agree that a LQ sub-forum would be a great idea in order to > > further raise the profile and individualise Slackware ARM, if for no > other > > reasons than to make for easier viewing and referral for people like me. > > It's also easier to get involved and post/reply specifically. :) > > > > I'm an avid Slackware acolyte with a strong interest in promoting it on > the > > RPi. The Raspberry Pi Foundation seems to have little or no interest in > > supporting Slackware ARM (or even recognising that it exists) which seems > > counter-productive towards their goal of bringing the 'real' > fundamentals of > > computing back to the masses. > > I don't know why that is - whether it's because it's a soft float port or > because the people behind the RPi favour Ubuntu or whatever. > Whatever the reason, there are a lot of RPi owners running Slackware on it > due to a combination of the community that built itself around that > device. > > > _______________________________________________ > ARMedslack mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack >
_______________________________________________ ARMedslack mailing list [email protected] http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
