Yet Another Mangal Pandey Review

----

 The Balls of Mangal Pandey: Review

I really wish Ketan Mehta had fictionalised this just a little more. 
Especially, towards the
end.

The build-up throughout the film made me expect a heavy duty well-orchestrated 
war scene in the
end, instead he cuts to still shots of school text book illustrations of the 
war.

That is the biggest disappointment of Mangal Pandey, which has been wrongly 
hyped as the desi
Braveheart. The very comparison with Braveheart does make Mangal pale, but 
that's only cuz
Ketan refused to change history, after having taken liberties to add a lot of 
fictional
characters and sub-plots.

Hence, to begin with, Mangal Pandey is a film best watched without any 
expectations whatsoever.
Once you've removed all preconceived notions, the phenomenal hype surrounding 
the film and the
fact that it took two years in the making and 18 months for Aamir to grow his 
hair, and get set
to watch it with a clear mind, without any prejudices or expectations, you 
surely will be
surprised.

Mangal Pandey is a pretty neat film. It is very good Indian cinema, with its 
melodrama, 'yeh
dosti' bonding between the heroes, songs that could have been done away with 
and an item
number. So if you're going in thinking a period film should not have any of 
this, you are
surely going to be disappointed. Some of my friends did not like it because it 
was very pop.

I for one, am glad that Mangal Pandey is made for us -- the dominant Indian 
sensibility, rather
than simply catering to the white audience (that apparently has more money to 
offer the film
than we do, given the overseas clout Aamir weilds).

Add to the fact that the story of Mangal Pandey in itself does not provide for 
elaborate war
scenes. It was just a rebellion, where one man stood his ground. Might not seem 
significant
after having heard and watched many large scale films on freedom and 
independence, but that's
where it helps to understand Indian history and place Mangal Pandey in the 
context of the
freedom struggle. The first ever recorded account of an Indian rebellion was 
his. The first
ever vision of a truly Independent India was his. This film basically shows us 
the balls he had
to take on the East India Company, in spite of knowing he was outnumbered 1: 
3,00,000!

So what he exactly did might not stretch more than maybe three separate acts of 
protest. There
sure might have been other unsung heroes. But the fact that Mangal did make his 
protest heard,
is what makes his story significant. To bring to the forefront these three 
episodes of bravado,
Ketan Mehta creates an elaborate setting during the first half of the film — 
the way of life in
a country ruled by the East India Company, the rapport Indian soldiers shared 
with the
Indian-born Brits (the sub-plot involving an Indian maid breast-feeding a white 
infant serves
as an excellent metaphor for the state of affairs) and the events that led to 
the making of a
rebel.

Ketan Mehta is a highly under-rated director. More than Varma, he has to be the 
original Indian
maverick filmmaker. Look at his range.

The Rising -- Ballad of Mangal Pandey, 2005; Aar Ya Paar, 1997; Oh Darling Yeh 
Hai India, 1995;
Sardar, 1994; Maya Memsaab, 1993; Hero Hiralal, 1988; Mirch Masala, 1987; Holi, 
1984; Bhavni
Bhavai 1980; and Toote Khilone, 1978.

The fact that most of these films are very different from each other shows us 
the repertoire of
the master craftsman. One person made the raw and rustic Mirch Masala, the 
slick and stylish
‘Oh Darling Yeh Hai India’ and the politically correct docu-drama in Sardar and 
now a
fictionalized kitchsy Mangal Pandey!

I even loved the mega-budget musical ‘Oh Darling Yeh Hai India’ (it ran just a 
week or two in
the city, so you’ll be excused for asking for not hearing about the film). 
Imagine, here was a
man who had the balls to make a full-fledged contemporary musical with 
political overtones.

Though a section of the audience will find the film sensual, a lot of the 
Indian audience is
likely to find it crude and voyeuristic in its depiction of women.

But again, Ketan could have made Mangal Pandey in the same sensibility as 
Sardar and I’m glad
he used a very mainstream Bollywood sensibility. Like the note at the beginning 
of the film
says:
Legends are born when history meets folklore.

I'm glad this is not in the realistic mould but roots itself in the folkish, 
with a very
"popish" modern feel just so that you know that the situations and 
circumstances are very
relevant in today's world where America controls operations in Iraq and 
Afghanistan, a world of
MNCs monopolising trade and finding slaves in every country around the world.

Next the performances:
Aamir: First rate (though I wish he had got rid of his boyish voice which jarrs 
with the
manly-get-up!)

Toby Stephens: As Gordon, seems more convincing than Mangal, with his head in 
tact on his
shoulder.

Rani: Shows plenty of cleavage, adds some glam and is super effective in that 
one scene when
she says: “Hum toh sirf jism bechtey hai, aap toh apni aatma bechtey hai” (“We 
only sell our
bodies to the Brits, you sell your soul,” she tells Mangal, the sepoy)

Amisha: Has nothing much to do, but kiss Toby and have that single tear drop 
during the
‘matter’ scene with him.

Om Puri: As the narrator, lends the film so much of credibility, as he 
translates the English
scenes for the junta.

It is pretty hard to believe that the guy Farookh Dhondy who wrote Kisna (the 
worst film ever)
wrote this too. He’s pretty adequate, or maybe cuz I really dreaded the idea of 
him writing for
this much-awaited film.

Himman Dhamija’s frames and Nitin Desai’s art do bring alive the world of 1857, 
full points to
them for making the film technically sound. The thing with A.R. Rahman is that 
he comes up with
these awesome songs that there was no way Ketan Mehta could’ve left them out of 
the film.

And the end of the film, you’re just left wondering: Damn, I wish there was 
that war-scene!
Would’ve made it so complete!

Instead, Ketan shifts to a minute long b/w docu reel on the freedom struggle 
and the subsequent
Indian independence in 1947, as a realization of Mangal’s dream of a free 
nation ruled by its
people.

Verdict: Must watch.

Post script: Leave your expectations at home. They could be sometimes be unfair 
and too
demanding.

Sudhish Kamath
The author is a journalist with The Hindu

"We neglect our cities at our peril. For, in neglecting them, we neglect the 
nation."
-John F. Kennedy




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hlirion/M=362335.6886442.7839733.3022183/D=grplch/S=1705331874:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124030885/A=2894366/R=0/SIG=138c78jl6/*http://www.networkforgood.org/topics/arts_culture/?source=YAHOO&cmpgn=GRP&RTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/";>What
 would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater? Donate or volunteer 
in the arts today at Network for Good</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

This August, Discover the Birth of Your Independence
and The Magic of A.R.Rahman's Music in 
Mangal Pandey - The Rising
http://www.risingthefilm.com
http://www.mangalpandeythefilm.com
Music released: Jul 14, 2005 Movie releases: Aug 12, 2005

Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic.
Only at arrahmanfans - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.

Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to