GURU CAST: Mithun Chakraborty, Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai, R. Madhavan, 
Vidya Balan and
others DIRECTOR: Mani Ratnam RATING:***

T he character of Gurukant Desai (Abhishek Bachchan) in Guru, facing an enquiry 
for corruption
and large scale irregularities in his company, says 40 years ago a man had 
broken rules and
today we call him Bapu! This highly irresponsible statement ends up devaluing 
Mani Ratnam’s
film.

Ratnam chooses as his hero a poor schoolmaster’s son, whose ambition and 
business acumen make
him India’s biggest industrialist. If he uses mostly foul means to get there, 
says the
director, it doesn’t really matter, because the end justifies the means.

His enemies, apart from a rival, old-money business house, are a newspaper 
baron and his former
mentor (Mithun Chakraborty) and his pet reporter (R. Madhavan). What they are 
exposing about
Guru is not wrong, yet they are portrayed as villains and Guru as a martyr and 
victim.

In making so simplistic a film, Mani Ratnam missed a great opportunity to 
portray an accurate
socio-political picture of contemporary India. The film moves within a very 
narrow circle,
obstinately refusing to look at the larger picture. Instead of wasting valuable 
time on rain
dances and item numbers, he could have made some comment on the era — India 
started changing
rapidly in the late eighties and nineties — and on the system that made a man 
like Gurukant
Desai a hero.

The first half is made up of quick vignettes of Guru going to Turkey to work at 
a low level
job- there’s a totally needless item number by Mallika Sherawat, and one had 
hoped at least
Mani Ratnam had grown beyond such juvenile box-office tactics. He returns to 
his village,
marries Sujata (Aishwarya Rai) for her dowry, so that he can start a business 
in Bombay. He is
up against the traditional traders who don’t want an outsider to crash into 
their domain. Here
he is befriended and helped by Nanaji (Chakraborty) and is soon a successful 
industrialist, who
makes his fortune by making small investors his partners and bypassing 
conventional finance
sources.

Overlook how superficial the film is and there are Mani Ratnam’s aesthetic 
visuals (Rajiv
Menon) to be admired, whether it is the rain-soaked village, Aishwarya Rai’s 
overwhelming
beauty or period Mumbai recreated by Samir Chanda. There are several highpoints 
— like Guru’s
brisk romance with Sujata, his fierce confidence when he confronts hostile 
traders, his
deviousness in dealing with a faceless minister, his bantering with Nanaji’s 
disabled
granddaughter (Vidya Balan) or his physical collapse towards the end. There are 
just as many
longueurs — like the unnecessary Madhavan-Vidya Balan track, or the many scenes 
devoted to the
brother-in-law (Arya Babbar); the Turkey scenes are too sketchy to leave an 
impression. The
music (A R Rahman) should have had a bit more of a period/Gujarati sound, and 
the choreography
is ordinary.

Abhishek Bachchan’s performance is both strenuous and studied, but he props up 
the film. If,
finally, Guru is disappointing, it’s because much better was expected from Mani 
Ratnam.

Deepa Gahlot

Reply via email to