ya.. that guy sucks.. i mean it.. i have noticed those stuff that u have pointed out..
On 1/14/07, Roshan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rediff has a bunch of pretentious reviewers and reporters. I had once posted about it when Guru's music was released. that raja sen is a pseudo intellect. the only thing he will rate high would be if it has any resemblance to any movie he might have seen on DVD, otherwise all others are just bad. thats his view. and a common motto of rediff is that they will never say good about anyone who is famous, successful. take for example AR Rahman. Raja sen once unnecessarily dragged his name in a bad way while he was talking about Omkara's music. Same goes when they reviewed Guru's music. same they did when RDB released. but despite of all these, they all became classics. it could be because rediff is not getting enough interviews from AR Rahman, Maniratnam or aishwarya rai ( oh yeah.. they hate her too, this same guy, raja sen reviewed her Website!!!) or may be just because they don't like them. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, "yeshrao81" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Friends, > One thing Im upset about is the Rediff's attitude in reviewing great > movies like Guru. They are so critical that they end up pulling down > great movies. They do not get into the intensity with which film or > music or cinematography is done...but just talk badly about > them...remember Guru music review!! > Why does this guy not understand that Guru is just dubbed in Tamil to > make tamil audience understand the dialogue and not completely think > of it as a Tamil film.... > Even the Hindi review of Guru in rediff was confusing...If this > reviewer cannot write a review with clarity why is he commenting on > great filmmakers like Maniratnam.... > I think its time that we start appreciating great efforts and give > them due credit. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, Gopal Srinivasan <catchgops@> > wrote: > > > > Tamil Guru does not have the real feel > > Sriram Iyer > > > > > > When Yuva was being made into a bilingual movie, the general > feeling was that Mani Ratnam had > > learnt from his failure in Uyire. > > > > But these impressions have dispelled now that Guru has been dubbed > and released in Tamil. > > > > Watch Guru for the actors > > > > Having to see Abhishek Bachchan and a whole lot of other actors > speaking Tamil while their lips > > move differently is quite a strain to begin with. Moreover, the > story is supposed to be set > > somewhere in Thirunelveli in southern Tamil Nadu whereas the > costumes and the set up resembles > > western India from where the original Hindi version is based. > > > > This hitch remains alive throughout the movie, successfully > depriving the viewer of the real > > feel. > > > > This time around Mani narrates the story of Guru Nath Desikan > (Abhishek Bachchan), a resolute > > boy from a small village who goes on to become one of the premier > industrialists of the > > country. The journey is characterised by hard work, determination, > passion, grit and quite a > > bit of the gray. > > > > 'Entertainment is not a bad word' > > > > Neither his poor family background nor his deterrent father could > stop him from going to Turkey > > where he delivers petrol cans. But soon his intense over-ambitious > materialistic urge forces > > him to quit the job and return to India to start his own business- > venture, the only barrier > > being the lack of finance. > > > > His decision to marry Sujatha (Aishwarya Rai), his best friend's > sister, only to get the dowry > > which he could use as his capital gives the viewer a clear idea of > the character very early in > > the movie. The occasional downhill ride does not bother the > extremely motivated profiteer, > > Guru. > > > > Straight from the Guru's mouth > > > > However, as he runs faster, he kicks up dust. Bribes and scandals > became the backdrop to his > > meteoric rise to glory. He isn't bothered but his near and dear > ones do bother. The rift > > between him and the righteous Nanaji (Mithun Chakraborty), Guru's > mentor during his early days > > in Mumbai and the editor of a newspaper, widens with every stage of > development in Guru's life. > > > > Along with Shyam (Madhavan), Nanaji constantly tries to expose the > unjust ways of the seemingly > > grand Guru. > > > > The movie successfully brings out the several facets of the life of > Guru. The realism in the > > evolution of his relationships with people around him shows the > distinguished touch of Mani > > Ratnam. > > > > Abhishek seems to like every bit of his streak in the gray that > started with Yuva. While he > > rules the show, the performance of the cast as a whole is > heartening, especially those from > > Mithunda and Madhavan. Aishwarya gets better in the second half > where there is less of an > > opportunity to flaunt her beauty. > > > > Marvelling over Mallika > > > > Vidya Balan and Manoj Joshi do quite well in their small roles. The > effort put in the movie > > becomes obvious in Abhishek's paunch that appeared and Madhavan's > paunch, quite a bit of which > > disappeared. > > > > The Rajiv Menon-Mani Ratnam duo, that spelt its magic in Bombay, > has worked again. With his > > expertise over the Digital Intermediate grading technique, Rajiv > has made the visuals look > > exemplary. Art director Samir Chanda's contribution in giving the > movie the period feel cannot > > be understated. > > > > The music of A.R.Rahman, though not one of his best albums, adds to > the feel, except for the > > odd abrupt song. > > > > Suriya does a good job lending his voice to Abhishek, but the movie > is too conspicuous a dub. > > > > Showcasing Guru > > > > The biggest drawback of the movie is the dubbing. It is quite > difficult to digest the fact that > > half the city of Mumbai speaks Tamil. > > > > The director of a company conducts a whole annual general meeting, > full of speeches that would > > shame the president of America, in Tamil. In the climax, a whole > judicial enquiry takes place, > > which is then followed by a monologue, all in Tamil. > > > > In addition to that, the movie doesn't focus much on the rise of > the industrialist itself, as > > much as on what followed the rise. In fact one might even say that > the character of Guru is > > little too black to be termed gray. > > > > The limit seems to be lost in the concluding reel, when there is an > attempt to portray the > > highly motivated capitalist as a patriotic and messiah and his > selfish and illegal profiteering > > as something very insignificant. > > > > Trying to compare unlawful business tactics to that of Gandhi's > rejection for colonial rule and > > its law was simply outrageous. For his class, Mani Ratnam could > have done without such > > idolising. Given the subject dealt with, that is not expected to > strike a chord with the > > masses, the dubbing in Tamil wasn't completely necessary. > > > > http://inhome.rediff.com/movies/2007/jan/13guru.htm > > >
