The movie is a great inspiratonal, The BGM is definitely good ....this is my view a true view
It is definitey worth my money and am going to watch it again ... not because of Rahman or Manirathnam ..but because it is a great movie and lot's there which i believe has gone unnoticed. Kind regards Logesh A On 1/17/07, s_sundarr_2000 < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi folks, am not willing to hurt any1 sentiments here! if ur a rahman fan its not mandatory that u shud always forcefully say u like his music. The music was absolutely stunning, i have listened to it atleast 500 times. what am saying is, mani has made a mess out of it.! why was tera bina not picturised fully/ why was mayya mayya not picturised properly, the same goes with barso re and baazi laga just 3 lines in the film. jaage hein always comes in background whenever abhishek is challeneged r he addresses his employees.? ay hairathe for scenes for abhishek /aish. there is no proper justification for abhishek's act? mani gives an explanation linking with gandhiji which i was ROTFL and he explained abt his past like working in shell and coming to india to set up factory. he did not show the growth (made us luk like its a rajni movie where he grows in 1 song), suddenly when he came to that point, he realised he has just come to interval and did not know what to add on so he brought in madhavan and vidya which was unnecessary. he did not realise that smooching scenes doesn't get u fixed with the movie rather averted bcoz the bonding between them was weak. time and again he refused that its not biopic but if u luk @ it every 1 knows it. father is a teacher/worked in shell/polyester/paralytic attack/case against him/twins. dont u see the connection. rahman has given his gud shot in the songs but mani failed to capitalise. u know how disappointed i was when krishna inserted songs in SOk munbe vaa and New york back to back. am equally with mani. change the format of making movie. anyway, i put my money on shankar as he knows where to insert songs and how to picturise it and how to keep audience engrossed. people in the show were walking out for songs r keeping their hands on their heads. this is public reaction ! anyway lets c how the movie fares, but i still persist with my earlier mail and dont start telling me that go out of this community and stuff, bcoz am a ardent rahman fan. cheers --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, "Sunil VG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The saddest thing about these mails is that some people (deliberately?) fail > to see the bigger picture! Guru is not about Mallika's seductive moves or > Ash's rain-soaked sari. This is an inspirational film about daring to dream > and pushing the envelope. This is a film about hope. One of those ladies > from the "Shakti Parivar" tells Maddy that if there were 10 Gurus, there > wouldn't be poverty in India. Lets look at the bigger picture - the essence > of the film. Let not the business of packaging the film for maximum > reachability get in the way of its underlying message and intention. If all > you could take home from the film were those "unnecessary rain scenes" or > those "unnecessary songs", well then....the lesser said the better. > > Well done Mani, Abhishek and AR :-) Its time once again to take a bow!!! > > Regards, > Sunil > > > On 1/16/07, s_sundarr_2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > this is my personal opinion abt guru. I watched it last sunday paying > > (wasting) 15$. > > > > I did not like the movie @ all. The things i hated in the movie are: > > > > 1.unnecessary episode of vidya balan/maddy, am sure mani wanted a > > movie to run for 2.45 hrs, with the original script it was only for 2 > > hrs, then he thougth to include this. > > 2. aish is not convincing in her role, look so thin and acting is jaded. > > 3. songs r unnecessary and placed badly in the movies. mayya (2 stanza > > was cut r probably pushed to background) is not necessary, immediately > > followd by barso re (again 2nd stanza pushed to background - except > > for few lines). ay hairathe does come in bits and pieces, tera bina is > > not fully picturised and fails to create a impact on screen as it was > > on trailers and audio's. yammo yammo was okey and baazi laga - highly > > unnecessary. > > 4. rajiv menons work was alrite and nothing that gr8. > > 5. rahman's bgm was okey, he used a lot of songs pieces in the bgm as > > they were not used by mani properly. > > 6. so many scenes in rain, barso re, whenver abhishek addresses his > > staff, prathap pothan episode. why does mani waste so much water when > > there is so much scarcity in chennai. the point is rain is not reqd. > > agreed in 1st song of mouna ragam but why repetedly here? > > 7. moves @ a liesurely pace and doesn't pick up anytime > > 8. abhishek does all his acts and justifies in 4.5 min saying .5 min > > is profit, naah it did not work. where did gandhi come in? who asked > > abt his past to the panel that 2 shirts/15000 rupees stuff? they were > > asking reasons and justifications for his act? > > 9.where did mithun disappear in the end? > > > > only gud thing was abhishek acting. rahman's songs fails to create an > > impact on screen, it was very gud in audio and i was jumping.! > > > > better luck next time mani ! probably lajjo is more in terms of period > > again who knows? > > > > waste of time and money! > > > > > > >
-- best regrards Logesh A
