I did not take offense :) ... I realised the quality part of it was not high after a single listening... The point is, i did not listen to it before posting the link; did not have speakers or headphones then...but as you yourself said, this s a clearer version of the low quality song; thats should be better than low quality :)
Balakrishnan --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "kaissiom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but this is not @ 320kbps. > > Saving a low quality, 64kpbs song for example, as a 320kpbs song, > doesn't make it 320kbps. > > Yes, the size will go up. Yes, it will say "320kbps". > But it's not "320kbps" of the original song. > It's 320kbps of the 64kbps song. So, you really end up with a very > clear version of a "low quality" song. > > No offense intended, Thank you Bala for sharing, it was all in good > spirit. Me being me, specially when it comes to quality, had to comment. > > Regards, > Wasim. > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Balakrishnan R" <vij0988@> wrote: > > > > I chanced upon a 320 kbps high quality version of the taj anthem....at > > the following link > > > > http://www.4shared.com/file/18338788/6972f8a2/Taj_Anthem_Audio_.html?s=1 > > > > Might be good enough till we wait for the CD release day after > tomorrow.... :) > > > > Balakrishnan > > > > -- > > "Only you can hurt yourself" > > - M.K.Gandhi > > >
