What rules? Everything was just created by men..mortals like anybody
else..And people blindly accept rules even when they become obsolete..

Standing up to National Anthem doesn't solve India's problems. . Whole
meaning of patriotism is crooked up.
(Vijaykanth is largely the reason for this ;) ).  Many people don't even
know the meaning of our National Anthem...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jana_Gana_Mana#Lyrics

It's a poem praising God, rather than our Nation. And there are so many
controversies even about the context in which it was written.

http://www.freeindia.org/vmataram/genesis_of_janaganamana.shtml

Let all those people who blame Rahman fix that first and let God bless them
with rational thinking!
I would ideally like National Anthem to adapt to current needs and
situations - Stress on National unity and development, Nation above self..so
on..

Most of the National Anthems were written during colonial times. . .praising
the ruler. Democracy has made us all equal.

But who dares to change? Every politician thinks within those crooked and
short sighted rules and exploits them for his/her advantage. .

Wrong forum to bring out this issue. Sorry.

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Gomzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   Old news. The high court dismissed the case which some nuthead had
> issued.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:54 PM, up84mouli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >   Hi All...
> >
> > Just read an article in Kumudam - A Tamil weekly.
> >
> > Sorry if this is an old post or was already discussed before...
> >
> > The writer - among other things - expresses dissatisfaction about the
> > way national honor or pride is compromised in various situations.
> >
> > Topping the list was the way the "National Anthem" remake is displayed
> > across the Sathyam theater screens after a movie.
> >
> > These are the two mistakes:
> >
> > 1. The song is too long: Actually National Anthem should be in a
> > specific tune and tempo and should exactly end within a particular
> > time but this song overrides all these things and it seems is legally
> > wrong.
> >
> > 2. There is no certification that accompanies the song, which again
> > is a major blunder.
> >
> > The person concluded saying that he would never heed the request to
> > stand up for the song as it is not legal and hence there is no need to
> > add to the disrespect already created...
> >
> > Any comments??
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chandra.
> >
> >
>  
>

Reply via email to