May be I am the only one here who thinks like that. But I think Shanker is a self-indulgent story teller whose recent movies have been awful. The good thin being his ear for good music and showing it in a grand manner on the screen. But the content and execution of his movies are just so ordinary.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gautam is better than shankar? man what on earth are you thinking?? > > > *Cool > * > *Jon* > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Thulasi Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, 29 September, 2008 10:11:21 AM > Subject: Re: [arr] Ajith-Gautham menon team up > > better than Shankar??.. that should be a joke!!! > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Leslie D <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com<[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Come on dude he is better than Shanker to say the least .. And also >> better than directors like Pravinkanth and SJ Suryah with whom ARR wasted >> lots of time and energy >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Thulasi Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com<[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> >>> i dont understand y people rate Gautam high.. lets c what he has to >>> deliver in COM >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:26 PM, sath.murthy <sath.murthy@ >>> yahoo.com<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> How come Gautam didnt offer his next film "Surangani" with Ajith to >>>> ARR? >>>> he has give it to Harris. >>>> >>>> I love to see Gautam works with ARR more.. he offered COM to ARR not his >>>> future ones... >>>> >>>> Sath. >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
