I truly stand by your point of view. Very well said Reformed Sinner.

--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Reformed Sinner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sriram - It all depends on your expectations. I guess you expect totally
> out-of-the-world fresh music everytime an ARR album releases. Most
of the
> times that is not going to happen.
> 
> Things were different in the 90s. ARR's music and sound stood out
among the
> other music that was coming out then. But since 2000, if you notice,
lots of
> music composers are sounding more & more like ARR. They have
incorporated
> lots of Rahmantic sounds into their music. So the uniqueness of
Rahman's 90s
> music was diluted and Rahman was forced to change his style.
> 
> Just think from ARR's point of view. If he keeps giving 90s style of
music,
> people complain he is repetitive. If he changes his style to something
> different, people say his style is gone and his quality has decreased.
> Either way there are only complaints. He cannot satisfy all every time.
> 
> coming back to expectations, i guess if Sakkarakatti was composed by any
> other MD, you would have probably called it good music. But since it
is from
> ARR, you are expecting much more. i wud say sakkarakatti is not that
bad,
> but it is not fair to compare it with ARR's previous works. It is
good in
> its own way.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:41 PM, sriramvr_in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >   ARR gave value for money earlier but it is not the case now. Busy
> > schedule is taking toll on him. ARR had earlier mentioned that if
> > there are 4 songs, he would give 4 perfect songs so that people get
> > VFM. Is that the case now? His quaility of output has decreased
> > sometimes and it is only because of his limited time and not
> > anything else. the arrangements are become stale. say out of 6 songs
> > in an album, only 2-3 are ok now which was not the case earlier.
> > there is nothing significantly refreshing in some of his recent
> > works. And being one of the ARR's oldest fans, I expect perfection
> > everytime.
> >



Reply via email to