Manmohini is Short but Cho Chweet .. :) On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:17 PM, jibandevta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In next release we should atleast have 'man mohiney' part2 and few > instrumentals..I m feeling this album incomplete... > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Vijay Anand" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i feel the same, manmohini is too short > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Anil Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yep ...the first time I heard it (and when I hadn't noticed its > duration > > > before-hand) - I thought that the song was going to build up > into something > > > even grander with more alaaps and percussion. But alas, it ended > just as > > > soon as I had started wishing that. > > > > > > Neverthless it still remains a gem of a song - even in its > present 3 minute > > > form. > > > > > > -A > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Chord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I love this track. It's hypnotic and makes you groove. Love > the > > >> classical singing. One problem: it's too short! Imagine if this > song > > >> had gone on longer, added tablas or dholaks to the rhythm track > and > > >> fast string riffs to the vocal alaaps....total of 5-6 minutes. > I just > > >> feel frustrated when this song ends because I want more of it > and > > >> fantasize additional instruments being added one by one. > > >> > > >> Oh well, I'm happy with the track anyway. It's one of my > favorites of > > >> Yuvvraaj. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -A > > > http://viewsnmuse.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > >
