Slumdog Millionaire – A Study in Contrasts November 12, 2008 - 0 comments What happens when the world of slums is confronted overnight with the glitz of millions? Jamal (Dev Patel), the protagonist of Slumdog Millionaire, finds that out to his discomfort. The film takes us through the ups and downs of Jamal’s fortunes, while at the same time presenting the dark underbelly of the Indian slums and the ugly face of utter poverty. Slumdog Millionaire sets out in a promising manner. Here we have a study in contrasts – India’s high tech and modern face juxtaposed against a backdrop of crippling and nerve-racking destitution. The peek into the slums comes almost as an eye-opener, impelling a sense of solidarity with these poorest of the poor, who nevertheless accept their situation and go about life just like you and me. Jamal, the hero who hails from a slum, comes close to winning the Indian version of the Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? quiz show, but being a slumdog, it is not so easy for him. Police arrest him on suspicion of fraud, as it is unacceptable that a slum-dweller could possess such knowledge. Jamal’s arrest is followed by grueling rounds of torture and interrogation, where he is forced to explain how he got to know each answer. And with each explanation, the film reverts to an extensive flashback of his dreadful childhood. The series of flashbacks, though informative and well-executed, slow down the narrative in no mean measure, creating the big hiccup in an otherwise enjoyable film. For the discerning viewer, there is also the added discomfiture at the unrealistic manner in which the quiz show's questions correspond chronologically with phases in Jamal's life. The story proceeds in a somewhat dream-like manner, but the realism in its execution stands in stark contrast. Director Danny Boyle's quick cuts and the deft use of moving, handheld cameras create expectation of speed, only to be frustrated by the languor inherent in the script. The vividness of portrayal, which helps viewers empathize, is what keeps the movie going. Freida Pinto also does a convincing act, along with co-star Dev Patel. Violence, some strong language, and sexual situations form part of the package. But the best part of the film is unquestionably the concluding 30 minutes, which make up for the gaps earlier on. The terrific ending leaves nothing to be desired. Viewers can cull enough takeaways from the ending, if from nothing else. This is why Slumdog Millionaire is a good one to set you thinking, and savor it as a lingering reminiscence.
http://www.themoneytimes.com/news/20081112/slumdog_millionaire_a_study_in_contrasts-id-1041158.html
