You have to digest that the one who funded is a Gujju. Those 3 Tamilians are loved by the world bcs they kept the language politics away.
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "vimaljk" <vima...@...> wrote: > > I completely agree. Plus, Mani and Rahman hail from the Tamil film > industry.....Also, Vikram is a MUCH better actor that Abhishek (not saying > that Abhi is bad but Vikram is probably one of the top 5 in the > country)...this clearly reeks of one version being favored over the > other....also i find it offensive that the Hindi version is the only one > being prepped to screen at Cannes.....but it could be the decision of the > producers (Reliance)..... > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Indmov Buff <indmovbuff@> wrote: > > > > I hope this isn't true. If it is, I am disappointed. Not that it will be on > > the 5th but that there won't be a formal launch. Hardly any promos as well. > > What makes Raavanan different from Raavan? Why is Raavanan being given the > > step motherly treatment ? It has Vikram, Prithviraj, Aishwarya, Maniratnam > > and Rahman - these names are Huge in the South. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: yeshrao81 <yeshrao81@> > > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Fri, 30 April, 2010 14:21:34 > > Subject: [arr] Raavanan audio on May 5 > > > > > > http://sify. com/movies/ tamil/fullstory. php?id=14940190 > > > > On May 5 Sony Music will launch straight into the southern market, the > > audio of Mani Ratnam's Raavanan. Sources have confirmed that there will be > > no formal audio launch. > > > > The reasons given out are the non-availability of the stars mainly AR > > Rahman and Mani Ratnam. The director is busy giving the final polish to the > > film which he plans to screen outside of the festival at Cannes. > > > > However Big Pictures and Sony Music are planning to hold a promotional > > press meet for Tamil Raavanan at a later date. > > >
