the author talks about distinct sounds and i think he/she has totally got it wrong.
behne de initial 50 secs will partially prove his claim wrong as the sound is totally unique. beera has plenty of unique sounds. ranjha ranjha anuradha's humming is quite unique i believe, kata kata interlude beats are abundantly unique, khilii re interlude flute and beats with varying pace is quite unique as well. On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:56 PM, AJ <purev...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Here's a comment I found on the net about Raavan's music: > > "Guys, without getting into the argument of whether this is one of ARR's > best and whether it would receive the same acclaim if it wasn't an ARR score > – didn't anyone else feel deja vu when listening to this album – every song > I felt like `This one's like Kala Bandar', this one's like `Barso Re', this > one's like `Rukmini' (in content, not in form) – of course ARR has a > distinct sound and so some of it is to be expected but still, its getting a > bit repetitive, me thinks" > > I completely don't know where this guy is coming from. Huh? To me, the > music of Raavan is completely original and fresh, sounding nothing (content > wise) like his previous works. Yes, his strong signatures are there and > certain raagas have been used before as always, but does anyone else feel > "deja vu" when listening to Raavan? None of the melodies in Raavan bear > resemblance to previous ARR songs and the song architecture and sound in > each track is very unique and distinct......something very new and fresh. It > does not sound repetitive at all to me.....WHATSOEVER!!! > > >
