Shawn,
Thanks. That ended up being the fix.
Brian
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> on
behalf of Shawn Scutchings <shawn.scutchi...@gov.ab.ca>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 3:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Performance Issues - Multitenancy
**
We had a similar issue and were provided the following by BMC:
The Engineer assisting us with this issue has reviewed the information provided
and agrees the query we see taking to complete are running row level access. He
would like you to test disabling the new RLS implementation and use the old
implementation to see if the issue persists or not.
1. Please open the Centralized Configuration form in the
com.bmc.arsys.server.shared section
2. Add the following parameter:
Disable-New-RLS-Implementation with a value of true
Disable-New-RLS-Implementation: T
3. Restart the servers in the group
This change will use a LIKE clause to allow the database to search the columns
directly. Once the change has been made the servers restarted, please enable
API, SQL, and Filter logging and reproduce the issue. If the performance impact
is seen searching the fields that have drop-down menus for non admin users
after the change has been made, please run the log zipper to gather and send
the log files and forward the zip file along with the name of the user who
performed the search.
Fixed our issue…worth a try.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 1:03 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Performance Issues - Multitenancy
**
Brian,
Turn on SQL Logging and perform the same search between the two different users
and compare the SQL, maybe even provide the sql here for analysis....the 'slow
vs fast' queries should be fairly obvious what's causing the difference.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Brian Pancia
<panc...@finityit.com<mailto:panc...@finityit.com>> wrote:
**
We are running into some serious performance issues with multitenancy. We're
on BMC ITSM 9.1 SP1 and SQL Server 2012. If I do a search on a form like
CTM:People with an account that has unrestricted access the search comes back
in about 2-3 seconds for 130000 records. That same search with a user that is
restricted to a certain company will come back in 70 seconds, which is a
significant difference. That is the first issue. The second issue is that the
database server CPU utilization will spike to 100% during the searches. During
the unrestricted user test not a big deal because it is only a couple seconds
and no one notices the spike. However, for the other user it brings the system
to a halt for 70 seconds. If the user kills their session prior to the search
complete the search will hang in the database and consume 100% of the CPU
indefinitely.
Any recommendations would be appreciated. We have done all the BMC recommended
performance tuning on the systems.
Thanks,
Brian
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail and its attachments
contain confidential information belonging to the sender, which is legally
privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or action in reliance upon the contents of
the information transmitted is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please delete it immediately.
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
and have been for 20 years_
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail and its attachments
contain confidential information belonging to the sender, which is legally
privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or action in reliance upon the contents of
the information transmitted is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please delete it immediately.
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
