Does FTS cost extra? What’s the downside/ drawbacks?
> On 10. May 2019, at 15:25, LJ LongWing <lj.longw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you have a CLOB, performance of searches is going to suck if doing it > directly at the DB level, if it's even possible....adding FTS to the field > indexes the field with a lucene index (FTS flat file), and a query against > that field doesn't go to the DB, instead it does the flatfile index search, > which is significantly more efficient and quicker than a db search.... > > So...yes it's avoidable if you don't want to take advantage of the things > that fts gives you....but your options of improving the effort with the DB > when searching a CLOB are very limited... > >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:07 AM Thomas Miskiewicz <tmisk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is FTS avoidable? >> >>> On May 10, 2019, at 3:03 PM, LJ LongWing <lj.longw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Would FTS help you in any way? I know it would help, but the question is >>> are you willing to make that change. >>> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Thomas Miskiewicz <tmisk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi All >>>> >>>> we had to increase the size of a char field to over 4000 with huge >>>> performance degradation when using this field for search. >>>> >>>> Does anyone know how to heal this? Would the Oracle 12 Text Option help? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thomas >>>> -- >>>> ARSList mailing list >>>> ARSList@arslist.org >>>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist >>> -- >>> ARSList mailing list >>> ARSList@arslist.org >>> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist >> >> -- >> ARSList mailing list >> ARSList@arslist.org >> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist > -- > ARSList mailing list > ARSList@arslist.org > https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
-- ARSList mailing list ARSList@arslist.org https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
