When you go into a company's configuration, on the Advanced tab you can
set up multiple tiers for the companies, although I'm not sure what that
does.  If you have ITSM 7 installed, go to the Application
Administration Console, select one of the companies you created, and
click "View".  Look at the Advanced Configuration tab, and try seeing
what the Multi-tiered Menu Structure does.

You might be able to use it to group the individual companies below into
what appears to be one organization though that, but since I've never
tried it I don't know how useful it would be.  If that is sufficient,
you could create the 12 companies like below and then combine them in
the Menu Structure Tier 1.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Multitenancy in a Large Enterprise



        **

        That would make the value no longer atomic.  That's not
acceptable per my requirement.




________________________________


        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Payne, George
        Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:48 PM
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
        Subject: Re: Multitenancy in a Large Enterprise



        Ok...maybe I'm being a little too simplistic here, but why don't
you just set up the following 12 "companies":

                Widgets Research

                Widgets Development

                Widgets Testing

                Widgets Contracting

                Sprockets Research

                Sprockets Development

                Sprockets Testing

                Sprockets Contracting

                Gizmos Research

                Gizmos Development

                Gizmos Testing

                Gizmos Contracting



        This should keep you from custom coding.



        Gp



        George Payne

        Assistant Director, User Services

        Information Technology Services

        University of Texas at Austin

        512.232.7513


________________________________


        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Rentfrow
        Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:32 PM
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
        Subject: Re: Multitenancy in a Large Enterprise



        There is no way to do this without custom coding.  However, it
can be done.  We are currently doing this exact thing for a customer
utilizing dynamic groups.


        We are doing it a level above where you are asking for it but
there is no reason it couldn't be done further down the tree.




________________________________


        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
        Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:20 PM
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
        Subject: Multitenancy in a Large Enterprise

        **

        Has anyone attempted to implement multitenancy in a large,
complex enterprise? Suppose I have a very large company called Acme
Incorporated, and let's say Acme actually consists of multiple
quasi-independent subsidiaries-Widgets, Sprockets, and Gizmos.



        Let's say Widgets, Sprockets, and Gizmos were each independent
companies that were recently acquired by Acme.  So Acme's structure
looks like this:



        Acme

                Widgets

                Sprockets

                Gizmos



        Now each subsidiary has independent business units-Research,
Development, Testing, and Contracting.  So now Acme looks like this:



        Acme

                Widgets

                        Research

                        Development

                        Testing

                        Contracting

                Sprockets

                        Research

                        Development

                        Testing

                        Contracting

                Gizmos

                        Research

                        Development

                        Testing

                        Contracting



        OK, so far, so good.  Here's the rub-Acme does not want each
independent business unit to be able to see the others' tickets.  In
other words, Widgets' Research unit cannot see tickets assigned to
Widgets' Testing unit and vice versa...unless, that is, Widgets'
Research unit wants to "throw the ball over the fence" to Widget's
Testing.



        According to the ITSM documentation, multitenancy can only be
effected at the company level...so my question is, can multitenancy be
implemented in the way I'm describing without any code modifications?



        Norm



        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___

        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was
submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This
posting was submitted with HTML in it___


The information in this e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, is intended 
for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) to which it is addressed and may 
contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information.  If you are not an 
intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and any use, 
review, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this information is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
the sender immediately of the erroneous transmission by reply e-mail, 
immediately delete this e-mail and all electronic copies of it from your system 
and destroy any hard copies of it that you may have made. Thank you.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to