Cheeti,

There are zero "additional features" that the Mid-Tier client has when
compared to the Windows based clients. By design the two clients
_should_ work identically, but there are differences. Some
technologies do not port to the web very well. (DDE,OLE) Some Remedy
Reporting limitations (maybe fixed, or mostly fixed in the v7.1
Mid-tier?) Limitations due to browser constructs. (pop-up blockers,
bookmark issues with Web applications that use URL constructs for
navigation, etc..)

But I guess since you have CSS/Javascipt in the web client you have
more opportunity to muck with the client than you do in the Windows
client too. So I guess some might consider that kind of
"non-supported" customization a "feature".

Oh.. wait... You need the Mid-Tier for Flashboards and Web Service to
work at all in ARS. So I guess there are two features that the "Web
client" has that the User Tool does not have.

The only "advantages" to the Web client that I see:
  it support OS's other than windows
  it does not require any special install on the client OS. (Other
than a supported browser)

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.


On 10/4/07, Cheeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ** Hi All
>
> Good Day for all.
>
> I am new to this group and remedy.
>
> As any one can mention the advantages of Mid-tier using JSP pages comparing
> to Remedy client.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Cheeti

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to