Cheeti, There are zero "additional features" that the Mid-Tier client has when compared to the Windows based clients. By design the two clients _should_ work identically, but there are differences. Some technologies do not port to the web very well. (DDE,OLE) Some Remedy Reporting limitations (maybe fixed, or mostly fixed in the v7.1 Mid-tier?) Limitations due to browser constructs. (pop-up blockers, bookmark issues with Web applications that use URL constructs for navigation, etc..)
But I guess since you have CSS/Javascipt in the web client you have more opportunity to muck with the client than you do in the Windows client too. So I guess some might consider that kind of "non-supported" customization a "feature". Oh.. wait... You need the Mid-Tier for Flashboards and Web Service to work at all in ARS. So I guess there are two features that the "Web client" has that the User Tool does not have. The only "advantages" to the Web client that I see: it support OS's other than windows it does not require any special install on the client OS. (Other than a supported browser) -- Carey Matthew Black Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP) ARS = Action Request System(Remedy) Love, then teach Solution = People + Process + Tools Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two. On 10/4/07, Cheeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Hi All > > Good Day for all. > > I am new to this group and remedy. > > As any one can mention the advantages of Mid-tier using JSP pages comparing > to Remedy client. > > Thanks & Regards, > Cheeti _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"