Thanks for the info Joe,
The suggestions didn't help so it looks like I'm going to have to roll
it back to 6.3
Can't have the CEO trying to use the application and the only
explanation I have for why it's taking 5x longer is because we upgraded
lol.
------------- 

Dylan Wheeler
Production Control Analyst Principal 
IT Operations 
Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A. 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
        Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:54 PM
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
        Subject: Re: 6.3 vs 7.0.1 slowness
        
        
        ** 
        If you have just performed an upgrade, you might want to flush
your transaction logs. When transaction logs are full it usually slows
down the response from the database. Log into the SQL Query Analyzer or
any other SQL client tool you have that you run your SQL transactions
when necessary. 
        
        Then run the following to flush your transaction logs assuming
the name of your AR System database is ARSystem
        Backup log ARSystem with truncate_only;
         
        This would truncate your transaction logs.
         
        After this as an optional step, you might want to shrink the
database too and then resize both the data and log files for the
ARSystem database. Give it sufficient free space for the data file, and
keep the transaction log file to about at least half the size of the log
files. (You can perform the shrink and the resize operations using the
MS-SQL Enterprise manager)
         
        Cheers
        
         
        Joe D'Souza

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wheeler, Dylan
                Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 6:28 PM
                To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
                Subject: 6.3 vs 7.0.1 slowness
                
                
                ** 
                Does 7x require a hefty server?
                I have a server that we upgraded from 6.3 to 7.0.1. One
of my refreshes was a bit lagging before but now it is a lot slower.
                It's a Dual 2.8G Xeon HT box with 4G of RAM, local MS
SQL install. Right now it's pretty much a development box with only 1 or
2 people connecting to it.
                 
                I have a display only form on there that has a table.
The table refresh on 6.3 patch 21 took about 2-3 minutes. That was
expected though because of all I was doing with it. Building a pretty
hefty query and then displaying about 2500 records with no paging.
                With the box now on 7.0.1 patch 4 with the same code,
same amount of records, the table refresh takes about 15 minutes.
                 
                I also notice that if I use the 7.0.1 or 7.1 admin and
client tool to connect to my 6.3 boxes it takes a lot longer to perform
things then with my 6.3 tools.
                Curious if it's just me or if others are seeing this as
well.

                ------------- 

                Dylan Wheeler
                Production Control Analyst Principal 
                IT Operations 
                Downey Savings & Loan Association, F.A. 
                Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 



This message and any attachments are for the intended recipient(s) only and may 
contain privileged, confidential and/or proprietary information about Downey 
Savings or its customers, which Downey Savings does not intend to disclose to 
the public.  If you received this message by mistake, please notify the sender 
by reply e-mail and delete the message and attachments.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to