Brian,
Perhaps I am having a slow day, but I'm not quite clear on the scenario you are
describing.
"I have 4500 records on an LDAP form that need to be updated."
Is this an ARDBC LDAP form? Are you wishing to update the original data from
your LDAP data source, or are you attempting to update/transform the LDAP data
as it is imported into another regular form in Remedy?
"One [option] is to use an escalation that pushes all the records, or the other
option, to use a form that initiates a push on ALL the LDAP records to push
over to the second form."
I'm sure I'm missing something here. These two options sound more or less
identical.
With the first option, is this an escalation on the ARDBC LDAP form? Where is
the escalation pushing the records to (if not to the second form you mentioned)?
With the second option, you mention using a "form" to initiate a push... Is
this the aforementioned "second form"? What workflow object is initiating the
push fields action (if not an escalation)? If it is a filter, which form is
the filter attached to, and what are the execution criteria (execute on, Run
If, Push Fields If)?
--Thomas
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Goralczyk
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:08 PM
Subject: Efficiency question
**
This is more of a "looking for a consensus or opinions" type email.
Running ARS 7.0.01 Patch 2 on a shared windows box that connected to an
Oracle database that is on a different shared box.
Using the User Tool but I don't think that matters.
The situation:
I have 4500 records on an LDAP form that need to be updated. I am
pushing them to another form to perform the work. I have two options. One of
them is to use an escalation that pushes all the records, or the other option,
to use a form that initiates a push on ALL the LDAP records to push over to the
second form.
I state that it is an LDAP form to indicate that I am using an external data
source, however; I don't believe that makes a difference.
I would believe that option 2 would be quicker as it doesn't use the single
threaded escalation process, however; this is not what I have found to be the
case. There is a discrepancy of 6 minutes with the escalation taking 7 minutes
to run. As you can see, this could be quite worrisome.
Any ideas or suggestions or even just straighten me out.
Thanks all,
Brian Goralczyk
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
