This seams to have done it. Thank you very much. Can you explain what the
difference between TR and DB status?

Thanks again.



Veeral Oza wrote:
> 
> In the Start when section, replace 'Status' = "Pending" with ( 'TR.Status'
> =
> "Pending" AND 'TR.Status' != 'DB.Status' ). I guess this should resolve
> the
> issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Veeral
> 
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM, npeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Microsoft AD guy here, recently thrust upon Remedy administration and
>> here
>> is
>> my current problem.
>>
>> I am using Remedy Service Desk 7 and I guess SLM 7 as well, I do not know
>> how to verify this. I have hacked my way through SLM and writing SLM's
>> and
>> business hours and just when I thought I had it all figured out I
>> realized
>> I
>> have a few SLM's triggering at times that I did not intend on.
>>
>> Here is one example -
>>
>> SLM Main screen -
>>
>> SLM Title - Pending Tickets
>> Applies To - incidents
>> Goal Type - Incident Response Time
>>
>> Terms and Conditions tab -
>>
>> 'Contact Company' = "My Companies name" AND 'Company' = "The applicable
>> division" AND 'Status' = "Pending" AND 'Assigned Group ID' =
>> "SGP000000000013"
>>
>> Goals and Cost tab -
>>
>> Hours - 120
>> Business Entity - This is selected and does work.
>>
>> Measurement tab -
>>
>> Start When - 'Status' = "Pending" AND 'Assigned Group ID'
>> = "SGP000000000013"
>>
>> Stop When - 'Status' != "Pending" AND 'Assigned Group ID'
>> != "SGP000000000013"
>>
>> Milestones tab -  I am pretty sure most of this is correct so I will only
>> note the questionable
>>
>> Execute if - 'Status' = "Pending"
>>
>> ***** The Issue******
>>
>> So my problem is that if I have an incident that is assigned for more
>> than
>> 120 hours, and then is changed to pending, this SLM immediately triggers.
>> What I would want to happen is that once the incident is set to pending,
>> the
>> 120 hours starts from the minute this change happens (Business schedules
>> applicable).
>>
>> Having a very amateurish understanding of coding I can see that there is
>> some logic issues with this SLM, however I just do not know the specifics
>> of
>> this application to pick the fix out.
>>
>> Any help from the experts would be greatly appreciated. Umm if you happen
>> to
>> run into some AD/SMS/SCCM issues I will gladly return knowledge.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> NP
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/SLM---Help-Creating-a-SLM-for-Pending-Incidents.-tp16801743p16801743.html
>> Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/SLM---Help-Creating-a-SLM-for-Pending-Incidents.-tp16801743p16808029.html
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to