Good point - as well sometimes I have seen cards set to "auto detect"
and you would get funky things happening as well.


On 6/26/08, Chowdhury, Tauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as the network goes, you may also want to check the link speed on
> the network cards on the servers in question and compare them to the
> switch port configuration. Often times, if the link speeds don't match,
> you will get a lot of funky things happening.
>
> Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.
> Sr. Analyst
> Informatics Service Desk
> 631.858.7777
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:44 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?
>
> You are probably referring to the QoS and ToS, but that really
> shouldn't be necessary unless the issue is caused by network
> saturation.  Chances are, latency is the core issue.  The only things
> I know of to address the apparent performance issue, assuming latency
> is the issue, include:
>
> - reduce the number of round trips between the client and server
> - alter the network topology so that the latency is reduced
> - identify devices that are overloaded causing increases in the
> latency and address them
>
> Axton Grams
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Susan Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > **
> > Dave,
> >
> > All of these are very good 'Remedy' answers.  But it is likely your
> gut
> > instinct of network is correct.  Went through this a few years back.
> Of
> > course the network is never to blame.  One location 5 mi from the
> server was
> > much slower than a location 200 mi from the server.  We used
> coordinated
> > stop-watch timings initially to document the issue.  Then we moved to
> > sniffer stuff.  It was finally acknowledged that the building only 5
> mi away
> > had a very poorly designed network (old) and it showed many hops
> within the
> > building.  Probably went further than the 200 mi building.
> >
> > Another factor that always played in a bit was how much video was
> being
> > played at PC's.  Remedy is chatty and all those little packets get
> stuck
> > behind those big blobs of video.  I don't remember the network terms,
> but
> > had something to do with setting the priority of the applications on
> the
> > network so our packets would go first before those other things.  I
> think
> > there was network  load balancing in play too for that.  Forgive me my
> poor
> > network language.
> >
> > Good luck ... uphill battle against the network team !
> >
> > Susan
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Ciplak, Can <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dave,
> >>
> >> When did you notice this issue? Have you introduced any change to the
> >> applications recently?
> >>
> >> If that is the case, try deleting .arv and .arf files at the client
> side
> >> and see if deleting the files helps with the issue.
> >>
> >> Can Ciplak
> >> NAV CANADA
> >>
> >> 613) 563-3512
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barber, David
> >> Sent: June 26, 2008 10:18 AM
> >> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> >> Subject: Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?
> >>
> >> Sorry ...
> >>
> >> Clients are all running on v7.0.01 user tool.  No mid tier in use.
> >> AR Server is running on Win2k3, 8 procssors
> >> Database is running sql server on similar hardware/OS to the AR
> Server
> >>
> >> The server/database are very close to each other.  Based in a data
> >> center somewhere very remote from us in head office.  Invariably here
> at
> >> head office performance is fine, its other users who generally have
> >> problems.
> >>
> >> From the experience and tests we've done it does appear to be
> sensitive
> >> to network performance.  Although having said that AR Server load is
> >> around 20-25%, SQL Server normally 90+% load.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Rentfrow
> >> Sent: 26 June 2008 15:06
> >> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> >> Subject: Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you give us more information about your setup?  Database type,
> >> server OS, web server type, etc?
> >>
> >> I assume you are using 1 AR Server connected to a local (relative to
> the
> >> server) database.
> >>
> >> You did not mention whether or not you are using the Web or Windows
> >> clients either.
> >>
> >> William Rentfrow
> >> Principal Consultant, StrataCom
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> O 952-432-0227
> >> C 701-306-6157
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>
> >> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of
> >> Barber, David
> >> Sent: Thu 6/26/2008 8:11 AM
> >> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> >> Subject: Remedy - sensitive to network performance?
> >>
> >>
> >> **
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone experienced end-user performance problems with Remedy over
> >> larger networks?
> >>
> >> We're running a suite of bespoke applications, and are finding that
> some
> >> tasks such as opening/updating incidents can take orders of magnitude
> >> longer in some locations.  For example it can take me 8 seconds, but
> a
> >> colleague at another location 2 or 3 minutes.
> >>
> >> Have been able to do some local benchmarks - typical ping responses
> are
> >> circa 10ms, but at points when we find that even our performance is
> hit,
> >> we find the network is responding to pings at maybe 60+ms.  Our
> network
> >> guys invariably say that the network is running fine ...
> >>
> >> So it appears that Remedy, or at least the applications we're
> running,
> >> are incredibly sensitive to network performance.  Any suggestions
> from
> >> the list as to what we can do to improve performance?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless
> e-mail
> >> security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
> >> proactive managed e-mail security service, visit
> >> http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/
> >>
> >> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also
> be
> >> subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s)
> >> named above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not
> >> read, copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information
> contained
> >> in this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify
> >> the sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply
> e-mail
> >> and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any
> copies.
> >>
> >> Cable and Wireless plc
> >> Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525
> >> Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ
> >> __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers
> Are"
> >> html___
> >>
> >>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> >> _______
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >>
> >> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless
> e-mail
> >> security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
> >> proactive managed e-mail security service, visit
> >> http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/
> >>
> >> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also
> be
> >> subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s)
> >> named above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not
> >> read, copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information
> contained
> >> in this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify
> >> the sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply
> e-mail
> >> and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any
> copies.
> >>
> >> Cable and Wireless plc
> >> Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525
> >> Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ
> >>
> >>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> >> _______
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> _______
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >
> > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> > html___
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> _______
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
> proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
> copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If 
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent 
> responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken 
> in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly 
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
> please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and 
> any copy of this e-mail and any printout.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to