Thanks all. 

I have already separated changes by Change Type so I think I will go
that route or just setup an approval mapping/process that kicks off if
the Change Environment is "Development."

 

 

Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Sr. Analyst

Office: 631.858.7765

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Issue with Change Management and Tasks (ITSM 7)

 

We have implemented something similar here as well.  We use the Change
Type to differentiate between various approval processes, as a "Change"
can be used for development work, but every modification to Production
(which is also tracked in the Environment field) requires a related
"Release".  You can set up your approval processes for each Change Type
if you'd like, or try to keep just one.

 

This seems to work ok, although it does cause some confusion when people
don't know that the two have different processes, and arbitrarily move
the "Change Type" field to a value that is used for a different process.
The other downside is that it may make your SOX reporting more difficult
because your reports will have to combine the data from the various
"Change" type requests that go into a single release.  As a result of
this, there is a lot of manual effort in providing evidence to the
auditors because we have to filter out related Changes that are not SOX
relevant (e.g. moving from dev to test environments.)

 

Shawn Pierson

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lisa Westerfield
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:26 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Issue with Change Management and Tasks (ITSM 7)

 

** 

I had something very similar in my last Change Management
implementation, as the client also required tasks such as Proof of
Concept to be performed before the change could be approved.

 

The client implemented a process where a change was created to perform
the POC, or development environment tasks, because they still had to
track those activities even though they were in a development
environment.  Once that POC was completed, a production change event was
created/related to it.  This allowed them all of the change
functionality in both environments with no detachment of the entire
process.  I believe the first change record for the development
environment was typically a "No Impact" type, requiring no approvals.

 

As far as I know this is still working out for them.  Good Luck!

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:39 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Issue with Change Management and Tasks (ITSM 7)

 

** 

All,

I need some guidance here. The normal change process keeps Tasks in
STAGED until the change is approved and in the Scheduled status. At that
point, I believe this filter:
INT:CHGTMS:CRQ:StatusScheduledActivateTasks

Activates the tasks. One of our business groups is the development team.
They need to be able to do some development tasks before the change is
approved by their manager in the planning in progress stage so that
after it is approved, they can then work on the production tasks. The 2
scenarios to accommodate this that I see is:

1.      Create a filter that allows the tasks to be fired off at
Planning in progress
2.      Have them create a change request that requires no approvals for
development tasks or use Incident management, and then relate it to the
Change that will be used in production.

 

2 is the easy way out but more work for the user....

Any guidance is much appreciated. Thanks. 

 

Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Sr. Analyst

Informatics

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

P Please consider the environment before printing this email 

 

 

________________________________

This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc.
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or
action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any
printout.

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 

  <http://www.bmc.com/userworld/>   

TuringSMI is a Platinum Sponsor of both BMC UserWorld Events

Email Disclaimer  
This email has been sent from the TuringSMI Group 

This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationship between TuringSMI, SMI Technologies, SMI Telco, its
subsidiaries or affiliates and you. Internet communications are not
secure and therefore the TuringSMI Group does not accept any legal
responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions
expressed are those of the author.  This message is intended for the
addressee(s) only and its contents and any attached files are strictly
confidential. If you have received it in error, please contact the
sender on the number above.

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 

Private and confidential as detailed here
<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail> . If you cannot access
hyperlink, please e-mail sender. 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___

**********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to