Well, if "working as expected" means that it now returns answers that are usually relevant and sometimes helpful, then I would have to validate your assertion. However, we may disagree slightly on the usefulness of the data as a whole. Right now, ARSList archives, and for that matter, Google, are still serving to be more useful. The problem doesn't seem to be with depth or quality - I would actually rate those pretty highly. There are simply many topics for which there are NO relevant entries. This adds more work for support, as I'm sure you're aware.
Rick On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Axton <axton.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > This should now be working as expected again. It's always the little > things that bite you. Please continue to post to the list when you > see that things are not working as expected. I will do my best to > watch for them and get things back in order. > > Axton Grams > > The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed > in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. > My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a > role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for > BMC Software, Inc. > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum > Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net<sponsor%3armisoluti...@verizon.net>ARSlist: > "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
