I guess my issue is that I do not have a GOLD set yet. I have many
different sources for data that will become the GOLD set but need to
first identify and then merge them.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Lyle Taylor<tayl...@ldschurch.org> wrote:
> Items can only be matched between datasets where the item in the master 
> dataset already has a reconciliation ID.  So, if the ID is zero in both 
> datasets, the items will never match.  The usual process is that you will 
> auto-identify the records (or some portion of them based on criteria that you 
> set in a qualification group) in the master dataset, and then you will run an 
> identification activity with the other dataset to see which items in the 
> second dataset match the items that you have already identified in the first 
> dataset.
>
> If neither of the datasets that you are talking about is the gold dataset 
> (BMC.ASSET), it would be good to first run an identification activity between 
> gold and one or both of the secondary datasets.  That way, you match up any 
> discovery items that already match gold.  Then you can auto-identify items in 
> one of the secondary datasets to identify new items that will eventually get 
> merged into gold.  Then, lastly, you can run an identification activity 
> between the two secondary datasets to find all items that match between them, 
> and merge the final results into gold if you want.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Lyle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frank Caruso
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:35 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Reconciliation - Identification Stage
>
> ARS 7.1p5
> SQL Server 2005
> CMDB 2.1 p4
>
> Have two datasets that were created from two different discovery
> sources. Each has several BMC Computer records. The reconciliation ID
> in both is set to 0 as neither has never been reconciled with another
> source.
> I created an identification activity to compare the two datasets
> matching on the Name. I set one of the datasets as the master in the
> activity. When I run the activity the second data set (non master)
> records gets assigned reconciliation IDs but the master dataset
> records do not.  It is my understanding that the identification
> activity would match records in the two datasets and give them the
> same reconciliation id. If I then take the identification job and
> reverse the roles of each dataset and rerun the job the records on
> both sides will get reconciliation ids that match.
>
> So it looks like you can do this sort of comparison but only when one
> dataset already has been reconciled?
>
> Does this make sense or am I missing something.
>
> TIA
>
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
>  NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
> copies of the original message.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to