My understanding is that since you are calling a Service (just like consuming an external web-service logically) that is an independent transaction. So an ERROR Trap will need to be constructed, and then service X_rollback would need to be called in the error handling...
Yes it adds much complication... HTH Robert On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Misi Mladoniczky <m...@rrr.se> wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a Filter Service that I call from a filter. The problem is > that data seems to be committed to the database even though there is an > ERROR later on in the processing. > > A1. Modify Filter in form A: Call Service X > > X2. Service Filter: pushes data to form X > > A2. Modify Filter in form A: generates ERROR (phase 2) > > The data pushed to form X via the Service Filteris commited to the data > > Is this as designed??? > > I was under the impression that everything should be rolled back if you > have a failiure. At least if you refrain from meddling with the filter > phasing, which I have not done... > > Any comments? > > ARServer version 7.6.04 on MS SQL Server. > > Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se > > Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10): > * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing. > * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs. > Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se. > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > -- _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
