You can use the Create New Request Action in Abydos Designer to create
Incidents in ITSM - it will prompt you automatically for the field values
that you want to push through from the Service Request, or set to whatever
values you want.

 

For more information see
http://www.abydos-workflow.com/Products/AbydosDesigner/tabid/60/Default.aspx

 

Kind Regards

Mark Herring

 

From: Nathan Aker [mailto:nathan_a...@mcafee.com] 
Sent: 05 July 2011 14:40
Subject: Re: Re : SRM 7.6.4 - Urgency/Priority

 

** 

This is a known “design feature” since the 2.x days.  I contacted support
with the same issue, certain fields were not being picked up from the
Incident template (Impact, Urgency, Incident Type, Source, etc.).  They
basically told me it worked that way because that’s the way it was designed
and intended to work (huh?)….

 

They gave me a documented workaround where you basically have to hard code
the mappings into the AOT for any of those values you want to change.  Nate.

 

Nathan Aker
ITSM Solution Architect

McAfee, Inc.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Frex Popo
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re : SRM 7.6.4 - Urgency/Priority

 

** 


Even if I specify the urgency/priority in the incident template, the values
won`t make it to the backend form, simply because there is an SRM active
link (SRS:SRC:SaveServiceRequest-CreateSR_NoAttach) which has these
hardcoded with values I am not interested in. If I want the request to have
priority High, it ends up being created as Low.

Pourquoi? :-)
 
Am I missing something?

Thanks
frex

--- En date de : Mar 5.7.11, Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr> a écrit :


De: Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr>
Objet: Re : SRM 7.6.4 - Group assignment
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Mardi 5 juillet 2011, 13h24


The incident only gets assigned to the right group if I override this in the
assignment form.

Is there anyway I can specify the group in the template only, without having
to create an assignment record for it in the assignement form? 

Many thanks in advance

frex

--- En date de : Mar 5.7.11, Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr> a écrit :


De: Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr>
Objet: Re : SRM 7.6.4 - Group assignment
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Mardi 5 juillet 2011, 13h11


Hello again,

Here is another one I found this morning..

I have an incident template with say (Group A) in the assigned group field.

I create an SRD that uses an AOT which uses the above template.

I send a request created from this SRD, the incident get eventually created
with all the data but I end up with the ticket being assigned to another
group, say (Group B).

I change the product categorisation for Group B in the assignment form but
the problem persists.

Any thought on this will be very much appreciated,

Thanks
frex



--- En date de : Sam 2.7.11, Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr> a écrit :


De: Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr>
Objet: Re : SRM 7.6.4 - mapping truncated.
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Samedi 2 juillet 2011, 20h13


 


Changing filters and field size doesn't seem to solve the issue......... so,
is there any work arround? 

 

thanks

frex

--- En date de : Ven 1.7.11, Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr> a écrit :


De: Frex Popo <frexp...@yahoo.fr>
Objet: SRM 7.6.4 - mapping truncated.
À: arl...@arslist.org
Date: Vendredi 1 juillet 2011, 12h48


Dear all,

 

I am having an issue with User responses not being mapped to the backend
incident. The value of the mapping gets truncated to 254 by the time its
written to the back end incident. I am concatenating the values from user
responses which when added up teh sum goes beyond the 255 characters. There
are two problem here, the first is a field mapping_trunc which is set 255
and a filter called SRS:QSR:SetTruncMapping_500 which even if you increase
the field mapping_trunc it will filter will truncate the sting to 254. My
question is, would changing the field size and the filter have any
ramifications, and is there a work arround to this.

 

Kind Regards,

frex

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to