wait that is not correct one to one; all to all but no many to one or many to many...
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com> wrote: > What would be nice is a multi-Global form which can be tied to multiple > (subset of companies) not every company, > that I can have multiple companies for only submit, but not to view. > > If you use global, all can see and use no matter what, which is not what > is needed. > Otherwise if you go to the granularity it is only single to single only > (too granular) > > It is like having the rich or the poor -- no option for middleclass.. ;-) > like what the current administration wants. > > one to one or many to many ;no many to one.. > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello, >> Question: you have 15 MultiTenancy companies // They all want to submit >> same type SRM, however we only want to see ours in the listing that we >> submitted (MultiTenancy). >> >> Scenario: instead of creating 15 srm's repeating every AOT, PDT, and >> workorder template for each site X the types = 1300 srm's.. >> We want 15 SRM's for all for submitting, however we need still to >> maintain the individuality of the search console.. >> >> IF they are global, entitlements no longer work.. If you use >> entitlements, you have to make the 1300.. >> >> IS the any better solution :: BMC? DOUG? Help ? >> >> -- >> Patrick Zandi >> > > > > -- > Patrick Zandi > -- Patrick Zandi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
