Jose,

 

This is a good explanation on how to accomplish this in Oracle.  However, I 
would really caution going down this path if you do not understand the database 
side and remedy tables on the backend.  Your recommendation for FTS is as you 
say the best option.  One slight update though to your article FTS is no longer 
separately licensed in 7.6.04.  We went back and forth on a client site 
recently to make the database changes and ultimately chose the FTS route 
because the risk of updating and maintaining the indexes was too high.

 

Brian

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jose Huerta
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:18 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: MS SQL question

 

** No performance hits in Oracle if you follow my post:  
http://theremedyforit.com/2011/12/case-insensitive-in-remedy/ 



Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager

Movil: 661 665 088

Telf.: 971 75 03 24

Fax: 971 75 07 94

 <http://www.sm2baleares.es/> 


SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi 

Edificio SM2 Parc Bit

07121 Palma de Mallorca

          <http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954>      
<http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares>      
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares> 

La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. 
La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la 
persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas 
no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por 
la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o 
entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato.

P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es 
necesario.





On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:04, Brian Pancia <panc...@finityit.com> wrote:

** 

Dave,

 

Sorry.  I wasn't trying to come across as comparing which is better, but after 
re-reading my post it doesn't directly answer your question.  I have not found 
any major gotchas with MS SQL.  Oracle case sensitivity has always been an 
issue.  You can set flags at the db level to change that, but then you are 
risking performance hits.

 

Tommy,

 

I have seen some issues with how FTS performs certain searches like wildcard 
searches.  It's been a few months since I've messed with FTS.  I'll see if I 
can dig up my notes from an installation we did that we ended up doing a bunch 
of tweaks to FTS.  FTS has been around for a long time now, so I'm sure a bunch 
of people can chime in on FTS tips and tricks.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 4:57 PM


To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: MS SQL question

 

** 

Brian,

 

I understand.  As I said I'm not asking which is better.  I'm attempting to 
understand if there are any hidden gotchas with MS SQL like there is with 
Oracle.

 

There my not be any but that is what I want to identify.

 

Thanks

Dave

On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:51 PM, "Brian Pancia" <panc...@finityit.com> wrote:

** 

Dave,

 

Case Sensitivity is not an issue with MS SQL.  Also with 7.6.04 you have FTS, 
which provides better search capabilities for both Oracle and SQL.  In my 
opinion MS SQL has come a long way in the last few releases and can stand up to 
Oracle as a true enterprise solution.  I think a few years ago there were some 
valid reasons to go Linux(or flavor of Unix)/Oracle.  Microsoft has come a long 
way though from both the OS and DB side of the house.  I think now it just 
depends on the level of onsite expertise for your DB.  I have set up multiple 
systems on both Oracle and MS SQL over the years and these days I find it much 
easier to go the Microsoft route.  Both are rock solid if configured properly.  
If you have FTS configured properly it does relief some of the Oracle 
constraints, but it is something additional you would have to manage.

 

Brian

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: MS SQL question

 

** 

I know that there are a couple of short comings with running the AR System on 
Oracle.  Namely case sensitivity and searching a large character field.  I'm 
wondering if there are short comings running on MS SQL.  Not really looking for 
a debate on the advantages of one over the other.  Just looking to see if MS 
SQL has any similar peculiarities.

 

Thanks

Dave

 

Dave Shellman
+1 717 810 3687 <tel:%2B1%20717%20810%203687>  tel
+1 717 810 2124 <tel:%2B1%20717%20810%202124>  fax
 <mailto:dave.shell...@te.com> dave.shell...@te.com

 

MS 161-043 
PO Box 3608 
Harrisburg, PA 17105-3608


 <http://www.te.com/> <image001.gif>

 

 <http://twitter.com/teconnectivity> <image002.png> 
<http://www.facebook.com/teconnectivity> <image003.png> 
<http://www.flickr.com/photos/teconnectivity/> <image004.png> 
<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1591657> <image005.png> 
<http://www.youtube.com/teconnectivity> <image006.png>

 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

<<image003.jpg>>

<<image004.jpg>>

Reply via email to