I'm curious how many people wouldn't require a solution to this gap if
they were going to use DDM.  Wouldn't not accounting for hard deletes be a
big risk to data quality post-migration?

Cheers,
Mark


>  *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *patrick zandi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:38 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: WARNING: 7.6.X DDM AND ITSM****
>
> ** **
>
> ** This by far is the best answer I have seen in a while (excluding david
> ) and how encouraging it is to see someone say,
> "We acknowledge" and  "we are working on it" and "We thank you for your
> feedback".. WOW , Really nice... I am encouraged.
> Those 3 things are encouraging.. ****
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Kagan, Ramon <ramon_ka...@bmc.com>
> wrote:****
>
> ** ****
>
> HI,****
>
>  ****
>
> We acknowledge that hard deletion of records is not something that is
> currently designed for with the DDM tool.  The general consideration on
> this was due to the fact that “soft” deletion is the prolific model
> officially designed for in the applications.  While hard deletes are
> possible, they often require both administrative access as well as taking
> the two step process.  We have heard from customers (and not all) that they
> are conducting hard deletes and we are working to close this gap in a
> future release.****
>
>  ****
>
> If you are in a situation where you require a solution to this gap, please
> contact BMC Customer Support and an interim solution can be provided.****
>
>  ****
>
> We thank you for your feedback, it is always appreciated.****
>
>  ****
> *
> ------------------------------
> *
>
>  ****
>
> *Ramon Kagan*****
>
> BMC Software****
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Goodall, Andrew C
> *Sent:* May-03-12 12:26 PM****
>
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: WARNING: 7.6.X DDM AND ITSM****
>
>  ****
>
> ** ****
>
> What makes me laugh is that this is BMC’s official product to primarily
> migrate their ITSM customers from previous versions to the latest and
> “greatest”.****
>
> Yet they don’t cover all the aspects for their own product ITSM.****
>
>  ****
>
> Regards,****
>
>  ****
>
> *Andrew Goodall*****
>
> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com 
> <http://www.jcp.com/>
> ****
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Guillaume Rheault
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:10 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: WARNING: 7.6.X DDM AND ITSM****
>
>  ****
>
> ** ****
>
> That's the reason why you need to use RRR|Chive, which is THE tool for
> data migration.
> DDM is not production ready yet, it's a nice concept but very limited.
> With all the money and resources that BMC spent on DDM,they could have just
> paid Misi from RRR to make RRR|Chive "prettier", i.e. essentially having a
> GUI and colorful reports so management **thinks** it's enterprise ready.
>
> You know how it is, management needs to see pretty power point slides to
> think (when they think) that a tool is enterprise ready. RRR|Chive does not
> have that prettiness,thanks God, but get's the work done. It's probably
> because Misi focused on the design of the tool that it works, instead of
> focusing on sugar-coated prettiness and fluff, which takes the focus away
> in developing something that really works.
>
> Guillaume****
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] on behalf of Goodall, Andrew C [ago...@jcp.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:54 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* WARNING: 7.6.X DDM AND ITSM****
>
> ** ****
>
> This is a heads up to anyone planning a 7.6.04 upgrade.****
>
>  ****
>
> So we’re using DDM (Delta Data Migration) to migrate data to the new
> 7.6.04 environment from our existing 7.5 implementation.****
>
> Well DDM is migrator based and it does not keep track of DELETE operations.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> ITSM workflow will often use DELETE operations on foundation data such as
> people permission, support group and functional role removals, product
> alias changes, etc…****
>
>  ****
>
> So now we have to keep track of all these changes and manually remediate
> them. As you can guess in a large enterprise this is substantial.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank you BMC, thank you very much! ****
>
>  ****
>
> Regards,****
>
>  ****
>
> *Andrew Goodall*****
>
> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com 
> <http://www.jcp.com/>
> ****
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and
> may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and
> any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick Zandi
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to