Jose, Have you tried to run the SQL query yourself ? Does it return a large number of records ? Do you perhaps have many records but few distinct values ? Don't trust the timestamps to much. Sometimes the log is written after the command was executed.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC <lj.longwing....@mda.mil> wrote: > Jose, > I would agree that you were waiting on a List thread. Have you run an > arloganalyzer on a larger sample of the log to determine if you are thread > bound? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jose Manuel Huerta Guillén > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 4:45 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Analizing a client log > > ** Hi listers, > > When opening a menu we see a big delay. The log retrieved at the client is: > > <CLAT> /* lun oct 01 2012 12:38:23.861 */+API call, Procedure #55 > <API > <TID: 0000004740> <RPC ID: 0001075159> <Queue: List > > <Client-RPC: 390620 > <USER: S013802 > > /* lun oct 01 2012 12:38:59.8080 */+EXPQRY ARExpandQueryMenu from Mid-tier > (protocol 14) at IP address XXXXXXXXXXXXXX > <SQL > <TID: 0000004740> <RPC ID: 0001075159> <Queue: List > > <Client-RPC: 390620 > <USER: S013802 > > /* lun oct 01 2012 12:38:59.8080 */SELECT T856.C1,C1000000009,C1000000008 > FROM T856 WHERE ((T856.C1000000007 = 'Resolution Method') AND (T856.C7 = 1)) > ORDER BY C1000000007 ASC,C1000000012 ASC,C1000000008 ASC, 1 ASC > <SQL > <TID: 0000004740> <RPC ID: 0001075159> <Queue: List > > <Client-RPC: 390620 > <USER: S013802 > > /* lun oct 01 2012 12:38:59.8080 */OK > <API > <TID: 0000004740> <RPC ID: 0001075159> <Queue: List > > <Client-RPC: 390620 > <USER: S013802 > > /* lun oct 01 2012 12:38:59.8080 */-EXPQRY OK > <CLAT> /* lun oct 01 2012 12:39:00.109 */-API call, Procedure #55 > > > What I see looking at the log is that the API call is made at 12:38:29 but > the API started to process at 12:38:59, that is 30 seconds later. My > deduction from this log is that the API call was waiting to the thread to be > available. Since the CPU usage currently is normally beyond 10% and the > database engine can still accept more consumption, that means that I must > increase the number of LIST threads. > > Is this correct or am I wrong? > > Thanks, > > Jose Manuel Huerta > http://theremedyforit.com/ > > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
