IMHO, BMC runs the risk of killing the last major advantage of Remedy as they 
try more and more to make the "server" part of the "app" and not layered.  I 
have held off accepting demonstrations/testing of the newer Galileo product, 
but from what I see, BMC keeps making small steps to do away with the 
development tool kit and more ITSM a sealed product.

You can't just buy AR Server any more, for example.  If I want to run a 
custom-only shop, I still have to buy ITSM just to get AR Server.  Same thing 
with Remedy OnDemand.  What if I just want a cloud instance of ARS to build 
custom tools on?

I think they want to get away from AR Server as a directly-manipulatable entity 
and make customers "accept" their product and then pay them or partners to make 
nominal customizations, preferring to use their spagetti-code config and 
bolt-ons they run with over a clean re-write.

My current jobsite has a ROD subscription running out at the end of this year.  
Unless the flexibility posture changes drastically, they just haven't evolved 
the "canned" product sufficiently to make it attractive to us.  We'll either 
run our customized-front-end or we'll drop BMC altogether in December.  Their 
canned stuff is, in our view, horribly inflexible and each version gets less 
and less open to FUNCTIONAL customization.  Their support answer to everything 
is "we don't know anything except out-of-the-box ITSM" (Tier 0/1 responses) vs 
the old days of "I don't know, but I'll pass your ticket up to an engineer and 
get you a session scheduled to review it."

I have one of your 24 Hours Fitness folks here now and they speak 
affectionately about the tool, but they also feel it is somewhat inflexible for 
evironments like ours here at Sony.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to