Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my upgrade/patching
LOE (throughout the server group) by using a reduced number of installed
apps on machines I don't want involved in failover. I may have to open
a ticket with support on this.
rp
On 2/20/2015 10:47 AM, LJ LongWing wrote:
**
Rick,
I don't have massive experience in this, but it is my understanding
that the best practice is to install the same software on all of the
machines in the group so that any 1 can take over any function at any
time in the future, because you never quite know what the future holds...
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Rick Phillips <r...@netfirst.com
<mailto:r...@netfirst.com>> wrote:
Hi,
8.1 ARS/Atrium/ITSM/SLM/SRM
I have a server group that consists of an admin server and a
single non-admin server. The admin server carries the load of all
admin functions, while the non-admin server is only for end users.
Recently, some of my atrium work has really been taxing the
resources of my admin server (extremely high CPU and RAM
utilization), and I'm investigating adding a third server solely
for atrium/spoon (recon, normalization, custom spoon jobs, etc.).
My question is: can I simply install ARS and Atrium on this third
server, or do I have to install the entire suite?
Thanks,
Rick
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org>
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
