Without looking, as far as I know, ARSPerl is not being actively developed. 

________________________________________
From: O'Hara, Brad [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:22 PM
To: ARSperl User Discussion
Cc: arsperl-users
Subject: Re: [Arsperl-users] ARSPerl with 7.6.04

I would like to know the future of this module. I haves used it for many years 
but am not sure what to do now. Is it actively developed?

Brad



On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:40 PM, "Eric Wolf" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Our organization is upgrading to 7.6.04 and I was wondering if anyone could 
> tell me any gotchas I might run into with the new API and ARSperl?  BMC 
> suggested that the hard client is not available for this release, web only, 
> so I was wondering what that does to ARSPerl transactions that are basically 
> acting like their own client.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Eric
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
> Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
> Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
>
>
> --
> Arsperl-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey


--
Arsperl-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey


--
Arsperl-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arsperl-users

Reply via email to