The same error occours if you're using maven 2.2.0. If you're using this
exact version, upgrade to 2.2.1 ou downgrade you maven client.

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:33, smy <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> After upgrading from Artifactory 2.1.3 to 2.2.2, checksum files deployed by
> Maven 2.2.1 are denied with return code 409 and the build fails. I tried
> setting the option to ignore the client checksum, but that didn't work.
> According to the access log, the pom is deployed by an authenticated user,
> but the md5 file is deployed by anonymous.
>
> artifactory.log:
>    Sending HTTP error code 409: Checksum error: received
> '342dd962c82975897e61a02defce7803' but actual is
> 'cfd53d8b655b26db396dbc2515ffc321'.
>
> access.log:
>    [DENIED DEPLOY]
> libs-releases-local:com/xxxxx/xxxxx-pom/8.0/xxxxx-pom-8.0.pom.md5 for
> anonymous/192.168.10.246.
>
> Maven log:
>    [INFO] Error deploying artifact: Failed to transfer file:
>
> http://xxxxx:8090/artifactory/libs-releases-local/com/xxxxx/xxxxx-pom-8.0.pom.md5
> .
> Return code is: 409
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Maven-build-fails-because-of-Artifactory-2.2.2-error-code-409-tp28057184p28057184.html
> Sent from the Artifactory-Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Artifactory-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users
>



-- 
BrunoJCM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Artifactory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

Reply via email to