We ran into this when upgrading from 3.9.4 to 4.5.1.  Our searches were
working with no issues then the same LDAP groups we had configured in
Artifactory started failing with this error.  The only way we were able to
get around the issue was to add a value to the Search Base setting for the
LDAP group in Artifactory.  Now it finds the group, but essentially we're
pointing directly to the group itself.  I believe this will cause any other
searches to fail if we were to ever add a nested group under this one.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Jim <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Has anyone gotten around this issue?  I have set up Artifactory recently
> and
> have several other servers doing LDAP searches similar to this without
> issue.
>
> Is there any way to pass a parameter or set configuration for java while
> starting Artifactory?  for example setMaxResults=0 or something.
>
> thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forums.jfrog.org/LDAP-error-when-result-set-is-larger-than-1000-entries-tp7580469p7580873.html
> Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Artifactory-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Artifactory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

Reply via email to