On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Srinivas, Raghavendra (IntlAssoc) <raghavendra.srini...@nist.gov> wrote: >>Back-to-back pulses are troublesome. Is that being used actively? > > As Daniel mentioned, for Ramsey experiments when you're scanning the delay, > when the delay is 0 you'd have two back to back pi/2 pulses. How would that > need to be coded differently? Explicitly, > > ttl.pulse(t_pi/2) > delay(t) > ttl.pulse(t_pi/2) > > and we scan t from 0 onwards.
ttl.on() delay(t_pi/2) ttl.pulse_off(t) delay(t_pi/2) ttl.off() would be a natural extension of the API. -- Robert Jördens. _______________________________________________ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
