Amine Chadly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a follow-up, > It seems like http://www.0xbadc0de.be/?part=libssh is better suited for > our ssh needs than silc... > It has all the encryption embedded. > At least we could use them both to cover it all... > What do you think ?
Unfortunately, I see two problems. One is that it seems to require Posix. I don't know if MSYS will work. If it doesn't, then we would have to use cygwin for windows. So we still would not be able to make standalone executables on Windows :( A bigger problem is that it depends on openssl, and the openssl license is deliberately incompatible with the GPL. I would rather not get into that kind of trouble again. However, it might be possible to replace all of that with Botan. That would be some work, though. As for silc, I had not looked at it extensively. If they don't implement basic things like sending packets, it may be better to use something else. Cheers, Walter _______________________________________________ Arx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/arx-users
