Hello ! > I may have asked about or mentioned this before, but would it be > possible to clearly separate archives from branches? Just trying to find > an example in the manual, I'm not sure which archive/branch names I > might grab that might be relevant and which are not.
Curiously, this has not been my biggest trouble :-). As you said it, with good names, you know exactly what's going on, and the browse command saves the day. What I have been asking myself lately is a result from an earlier discussion between you and Walter. It was about the workstation-laptop scenario. I have been thinking about that idea of having unique revision identifications. I was also trying to understand that 'uncentralized' buzz of bitkeeper which is difficult as I have never used it. Anyways, at one point you asked : > We have one conceptual archive, but two actual copies. One is an ArX > mirror of the other. Or are they each mirrors of each other? In some > cases, might one be an scp exact copy of the other? and Walter answered : > All of the above. I would like to know how one would end up in such situation. Basically, I have been asking myself how a everyday use of ArX would be like in a development team... and I still haven't found a simple answer yet. ... Cheers, -amine _______________________________________________ Arx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/arx-users
