Walter Landry wrote:
Just a few thoughts:
What is wrong with CVS's language? I thought it was written in C?
You are correct. When I was creating the table, I thought C would fall
barely on the "not acceptable" side of languages, but by the time I
wrote the text above, I had decided that C was barely acceptable. Either
way, CVS fails immediately because it's not distributed.
MS Windows does support hard links
Well...not by my definition of "MS Windows". Most Windows partitions are
still FAT, not NTFS, and FAT doesn't have hard links. Worse, the
mercurial guys have had a terrible time supporting hard links on NTFS.
I'm not sure if it's due to poor docs, bugs, or what.
Thanks for your feedback.
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Arx-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/arx-users
