C'mon can't we all get along? I think we should schedule a message board BBQ. We could all get together and argue face to face. Is Asbury Partners any good? The council? The lights on the boardwalk.
See it could be fun
Skip Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Skip Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I could have asked 'come out', but I know that would be misinterpreted.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Come clean? I don't recall the issue of who I am ever coming up,
> Skip.
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'm glad you enjoyed that; now why don't you come clean and sign
> your
> > contributions? I assume from Dan's letters that you are in fact
> Tom
> > DeSeno.
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Now that's funny Skip! See, we can rib each other a little bit
> > > without actully being insulting.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > `As for you calling me an "ambulance chaser,"'
> > > > I have it on good authority that Tommy, BB82 or whoever in
> hell
> > > this
> > > > is, limits himself to chasing monster trucks; and you can take
> > > that to
> > > > the bank.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Nice backtrack. Now you're just projecting your lack of
> > > > > understanding on to me. My original post made no mention of
> the
> > > > > bankruptcy clause. It was your original post that tried to
> make
> > > it
> > > > > seem the redevelopment rights would stay clear of the
> bankruptcy
> > > > > court (that was the point of your post), which you clearly
> > > concede
> > > > > now that it won't.
> > > > >
> > > > > As for your assertion that the lawyers you work with
> > > > > aren't "practicing in AP" (as if that is beneath them),
> well,
> > > that's
> > > > > just you pointing out again your disdain for people from
> Asbury
> > > Park
> > > > > and this area in general, which is how we met in the first
> > > place,
> > > > > isn't it?
> > > > >
> > > > > As for you calling me an "ambulance chaser," when my
> adversary
> > > has
> > > > > nothing left to retort with but name calling, that's when I
> know
> > > > > I've won the arguement.
> > > > >
> > > > > By the way, if you read that old triCity article, you will
> find
> > > I
> > > > > never called into question your abilities in your field. I
> > > wouldn't
> > > > > do that. I made the point that I thought you would have a
> > > conflict
> > > > > on one matter: valuing the triangle property, due to your
> > > comments
> > > > > about (and obvious feeling toward) the parties. Having a
> > > conflict
> > > > > on a case is not a knock against your abilities. I've been
> > > > > conflicted out of a number of cases for a variety of reasons.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, before I forget. There was a mistake of law in your
> > > question to
> > > > > Jim Aaron - Bankruptcy Court is a court of equity, not law.
> > > > >
> > > > > Look, you aren't outmatched in this conversation because law
> is
> > > my
> > > > > field. You're just outmatched by a guy from AP.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I never said it was "no good." I've read your bragging
> > > about
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > lawyers you deal with being the best there is. Go ask
> one
> > > of
> > > > > them
> > > > > > > what proceedings you could expect from creditors if this
> > > > > provision
> > > > > > > is triggered.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom, there is always litigation, that's why there are
> lawyers.
> > > > > You're
> > > > > > good at sound bites but short on proof as always. I hope
> you
> > > go
> > > > > into
> > > > > > court with more than that. Say what you will but your
> original
> > > > > post
> > > > > > made it seem as if the clause was not worth the paper it
> was
> > > > > written
> > > > > > on. I am sure you are aware that any creditors would see
> the
> > > > > agreement
> > > > > > and see that the city has a reverter clause. Also,
> creditors
> > > have
> > > > > the
> > > > > > right to remedy any defaults but all have to be approved
> by
> > > the
> > > > > city.
> > > > > > I will defer to you on bankruptcy law. Be sure that the
> > > attorneys
> > > > > I
> > > > > > work with do not chase ambulances or practice in AP or
> Toms
> > > River.
> > > > > In
> > > > > > the end you are right that there will be litigation, but
> > > > > litigation is
> > > > > > not necessrily bad. Sometimes it is the only choice when
> one
> > > party
> > > > > to
> > > > > > a contract will not perform. Your rationale says that one
> > > should
> > > > > not
> > > > > > ask that party to perform as agreed to in the contract
> lest
> > > they
> > > > > > litigate. That is my very early point about having a gun
> when
> > > they
> > > > > > other guy knows you'll never pull the trigger. Do you know
> > > where
> > > > > that
> > > > > > gun will land up? You'll need a proctologist to remove it.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
