"I note once again that you are using personal insults in your posts
I am respectfully requesting that you stop doing that."
Shucks Tom, I was attacking bottom feeders; now it's understood you're
one of that noble profession, but I dare say though protest too
much. You've run unopposed the last week dogmatically reinventing
history and US social foibles; while you seem to revel in
speak/writing from the bully pulpit, it seems odd that you so easily
take offense when called to task. I suggested a while ago that if you
can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; perhaps a job as wait
staff, all the better to feed your brethren.
Your complaint is silly, of course I've covered this before, you've
been hung by your own petard; why not get over it and find some poor
bastard you can represent? While searching you might review case law;
I'm thinking "man bites dog", in your case a version of "dog bites
man", i.e. lawyer bitten by his dogma.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Skippy,
>
> I note once again that you are using personal insults in your posts,
> and note also that no one else but you is doing so on this board. I
> am respectfully requesting that you stop doing that. I hope others
> on this board will join me in this request.
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > `"I'll bet anyone involved in the hearing [will]
take credit for
> the
> > process that "disentangled" Asbury Park from the bankruptcy. I'll
> bet
> > MD Sass' lawywer is taking credit for "disentangling" Asbury Park
> from
> > the bankruptcy. Anyone involved in that process can take credit
> for
> > solving a terrible problem that buried AP for years. I fully
> > understand that most (on this board) don't want to thank the folks
> > that got the job done. I do."'
> >
> > It's hard to thank the bottom feeders for disentangling us from
> > procedures that lie at the heart of what they do. I suppose we
> could
> > join Tommy and thank Aaron for snookering one of his brethren; but
> to
> > many, that would be little different than praising a hostage taker
> > after payment is made and the hostage is released. Rather than
> rush
> > to thank Mr. Aaron, who remains on the payroll of Fishman while
> > supposedly acting to protect the interests of Asbury Park, I think
> it
> > more prudent to continue to challenge his continuing abuse of
> property
> > owners in Asbury whose lands Fishman covets.
> >
> > As to the rest of the bottom feeders, aren't we past the time when
> > these modern day robber barons are to be trusted with our future
> > wellbeing? Is it any wonder that in the world's most litigious
> > society, lawyers dominate our legislature; their dietary needs now
> > dictate legislation and economic development?
> >
> > Of course Tommy thanks his brethren; it is but for them and their
> > cartel that he is able to feed.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > RevKev,
> > >
> > > Asbury was a creditor in the proceedings, so naturally they took
> > > part, represented by counsel. I'll bet anyone involved in the
> > > hearing wherenin the Bankruptcy Judge approved the sale is going
> to
> > > properly take credit for being part of the process
> > > that "disentangled" Asbury Park from the bankruptcy. I'll bet
> MD
> > > Sass' lawywer is taking credit for "disentangling" Asbury Park
> from
> > > the bankruptcy. I'll bet Carabetta's lawyer is taking credit
> > > for "disentangleing" him from the bankruptcy. So too with the
> > > Trustee, the Judge, the law clerks, the secretaries, the drivers
> > > that drove them all too court, etc. Anyone involved in that
> process
> > > can take credit for solving a terrible problem that buried AP
> for
> > > years.
> > >
> > > I fully understand that most (on this board) don't want to thank
> the
> > > folks that got the job done. I do.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > If what Tommy says is all true about the redevelopment rights
> and
> > > how anyone
> > > > could have bid on them under normal bankruptcy circumstances,
> than
> > > why did
> > > > James Aaron get heralded for a unique strategy in getting the
> > > development
> > > > rights out of the Court Room.
> > > >
> > > > The following is from The Firm's web site:
> > > >
> > > > At the recent groundbreaking for one of the redevelopment
> sites
> > > in Asbury
> > > > Park, City Officials recognized City Redevelopment Attorney
> James
> > > G. Aaron for
> > > > his help in disentangling the City from a complex bankruptcy
> case
> > > and keeping
> > > > the project moving forward despite numerous legal challenges.
> Mr.
> > > Aaron
> > > > argued to extract Asbury Park from a 10-year bankruptcy which
> had
> > > allowed the
> > > > bankrupt developer to hold on to development rights and real
> > > estate in the City,
> > > > thereby prohibiting the City from collecting taxes on the
> > > properties and
> > > > from terminating the developerâs rights. Thereafter, Mr.
> Aaron
> > > successfully
> > > > defeated claims of objectors that the new Redevelopment Plan
> was
> > > > unconstitutional and arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
